Ah, I see. I suppose what I was saying is that, a lot of people generally regardless group all of those Pokemon as "legendaries", y'know? I understand that GF itself all has separate classifications of them, and that's fine and dandy. But when it comes to us players, it seems that all that matters to most of us is "well, how many legendaries is GF going to introduce this time around?". It's because of this that I say that it might get tiring, at least in the long-run of things.
Of course, what I'm saying is completely based on subjectivity, and heck, I don't personally believe that it'll get tiring anytime soon, that just might be the perspective of most people, y'know? When it comes to the players, some of them don't group them in things like "Mythical Pokemon", or "Mirage Pokemon", things of that nature. As far as most players are concerned, they're all legendaries and are cooped up in that one category, basically. Kind of unfair, but oh well.
That's my perspective of things. As long as there's some sort of backstory behind said legends, what's the hurt behind it? I'd certainly like some sort of explanation as to why a certain legendary would exist, rather than just have it there for the heck of it. When it cmmes to stats though, I do agree with you. You have the smaller legendaries that typically share base 100 in pretty much all stats, and then you have the larger ones who are more diversified. It's more or less kind of a predictable thing at this point, and nothing too surprising, but personally speaking, it doesn't have any real effect on me whatsoever.
Also, what do you mean by "the combination is never really that amazing"? o.o If you're talkign about the variety as far as movesets, typing, etc are concerned, I suppose that's a point, but...
