That is only a concept, as I've stated before, and has no "scientific basis" - it's just self-glorification that many scientists use to make themselves think that they're fully defining the universe. They're attempting to, very very weakly, wherein the majority of our findings were through accidents - not by following the language to the nearest detail.
Do remember that the majority of science was originally qualitative, not quantitative. And we did fine enough before the 1900s, when numbers became the bane of thought.
--
Actually, yes, you can get a thorough report by searching Google. You should find a book in the results - which will show you all of his records. That is, if you can read the original language >.> Otherwise, you'll need to find a translated version...
But yes. Google. It has everything.
And yes, it is scientific in nature. It uses the scientific method, literally all-throughout. Reichenbach took hundreds of people throughout Europe and experimented on them, using every process required by his discipline at the time. His books were bestsellers worldwide due to their thorough use of proper logic, reasoning, and attention to detail. Then some scientists at the head of universities at the time heard wind of his theory, they had something up their butts - as usual - since his theory was not what they were used to, and they spread around the idea to everyone that they "disproved" it even though they had no evidence at all, whatsoever, against it.
Anna Nekaris is an absolute expert on primates of every kind throughout the world and has spent her life researching everything about them. Her findings in regards to Bigfoot are based completely on biological scientific reasoning, geological findings, and relations between certain events to others - all based on scientific methods of reasoning.
Reichenbach discovered a force called Odyle which is in a trinity with Electricity and Magnetism. It is, thus, electromagnodic force, not electromagnetic force. Odyle is the reason why specific colors exist in certain areas whenever there is a sufficient enough electricity and magnetism. The Aurora's colors exist when certain chemical elements interact with others, apparently, but this doesn't explain WHY certain interactions create certain colors and not others. The Aura is a way of looking at a person's EMF - a concept which is deemed valid - just by the way of seeing Odyle instead of electricity...or nothing at all. Being able to see odyle, as he said, is simply a matter of whether or not you are born with the ability. It is simply something allowed by your eyes - many people can see odyle better than others. We can all see the Aurora, for example, because electromagnetism is strongest at the poles. Seeing Auras is a bit harder, requiring better natural ability to see odyle.
It is unknown what all odyle is meant to do, just as it is unknown what bigfoot's proper composition is. But as long as people count these concepts as invalid, they won't be properly studied.
--
But don't think I'm just going on a rant about those two alone. They are amongst millions of concepts, thousands of which are tried and true by scientific standards, which have simply been discredited by an ignorant population of the sci community, which have always happened to have enough support to discredit anything, even without evidence against those things.