That's harsh. Really harsh, in fact. To lose respect for someone after one mistake (or a bad decision that degenerated into a whole chain of idiot decisions) isn't entirely right. I wouldn't particularly hold up a pregnant teenager as a role model, but I respect her as a human being and I want to offer her help to the best of my ability. One of my friends is pregnant currently. She baby-sat me and my younger sisters, she's taught me a lot about walking with God, and she's been a huge encouragement. She went to college, hung out with the wrong people, and now she's paying for her mistakes. She's sorry, she knows what she did was wrong, and she thinks that she's failed me and my sisters as a mentor. I respect her still because she understands why what she did was wrong and she wants forgiveness. She's even understood the consequences of her actions and accepted them. To me, that makes her someone to be admired. She's repented, she's been forgiven, she's accepted the consequences of her actions. It's over and done with, simple as that. All that's left to say is "Go thou and sin no more."
My own views on teenage pregnancy stem from my religion and what I know of the Bible. Yes, teenage pregnancy is wrong. Extramarital sex is wrong. There is a reason that precautions need to be taken when performing it: having sex with too many people too early is dangerous. Your life could be changed in an instant. As for abortion as a method of dealing with early pregnancy, it is not a good move. There exists, currently, at least one foundation that was formed to shelter and counsel women who've had abortions and feel that what they've done was wrong. If there wasn't some sort of moral twitch felt when we aborted children, why would a foundation such as this exist? In addition, abortion could be traumatic for children born later. If you knew your parents had an abortion before you were born, wouldn't it send the message that if you too had been conceived before it was convenient, they would have killed you too? Let me make a point by saying that I object to abortion on the grounds that it is truly murder. Babies have hearts before the period at which abortion is legal is expired. They have fingers. They... on second thought, I'll save my discourse on abortion for another thread because if I pick up steam I can completely run over everyone in my path.
Okay, next article on the business list. My views on the whole "safe sex" thing are that there is no such thing. There's always a chance that something will go wrong. Either you do the smart thing and abstain, or you take the risk and accept your consequences. If you do make the wrong decision, you'd better be willing to accept whatever comes after. That includes pregnancy. If you're a Christian, it'll probably include some form of discipline from the elders until you show repentance and true "brokeness of spirit" (i.e., you won't be taking communion/mass until you are saddened by what you've done). Afterwards, you're welcomed back. I don't think someone becomes evil or sub-human in some way after having premarital sex and becoming pregnant, I just think it's a wrong action and will and should involve some form of consequence.
If the pregnancy is a result of a rape, that's another matter. The hard part of this is that I really believe that abortion for any situation is wrong. If you are raped and truly don't want the child, adoption is the only acceptable answer in the eyes of the church. It hurts and you will suffer in ways that I really can't begin to imagine, but it's just going to be another test that you'll have to overcome. It sounds callous when I say it like that, but that's the facts. You can accept them or reject them. Just accept the consequences afterward for whatever decision you make.
All actions have consequences.
However, while this is has nothing to do with your personal beliefs, the teachings of the Church aren't fact, because their teachings are religious. I'm honestly not sure if you're saying the views of the Church are fact and law and should be accepted and followed by all, or just stating the views of the Church, to be honest.
But, to me, it seems a case of 'easier said than done'. People deal differently with things, and it's unreasonable to hold them all to one standard. Mistakes happen. People fail those 'tests', if you'd prefer to phrase it that way. It's not just a matter of 'you must overcome it' and one overcomes it.
However, I agree with your point to pink-tiger. I think my posts in this thread have expressed my belief of 'mistakes happen'.
ETA: Sorry, I missed a chunk of your post.
Of course most women feel moral twitches when aborting their foetuses; it isn't a simple act. People seem to believe that it's an easy act, that women just walk into a clinic and abort it rather than wear birth control. I won't continue with the abortion debate, as I, too, have great passion about the subject and will debate it until the end -- however, the abortion debate is always going to be linked with the teenage pregnancy debate. I will refute your paragraph, however, to the best of my ability.
The truth of the matter is that it isn't killing. It's not infanticide. It's aborting a foetus, not killing a baby. Sure, it might traumatise some kids -- that's expected. But, with your reasoning, that's just another test these people have to overcome. It isn't that easy for most people to walk into an abortion clinic and say 'Abort it, NOW'. These foundations exist because some women knee-jerk, or later forget the circumstances they were in and want their baby when they're in a more stable environment, or were even pressured to abortion. Those are just three of the many possibilities. But the existence of those foundations isn't proof that it's wrong, and neither is a moral twitch. Sometimes you just have to suck it up [the moral twitch] and do what you know is right for you. That right is subjective. It's not for other people to decide. If these foundations exist as proof of the immorality of the action, why do pro-choice foundations exist? Why do sites like I'm Not Sorry exist? [I'm Not Sorry is a site full of women posting their abortion stories, the ones who don't regret their decision.] The answer to this is because that right
is subjective, varies from person to person.
I sympathise with any woman who regrets her abortion; I do not think the actions of these women should determine the reproductive rights of another woman. We don't need protecting -- maybe some of us can't make these sorts of decisions rationally, but, in the end, to me, people are always going to have something to regret. Some regrets are bigger regrets than others, but you yourself stated that people must take responsibility for their actions. And that logic applies to the pro-choice argument as well.