Not excatly. I'm just going to quote the Spanish law (which is the one I know best about, and which describes this well):
"A child is considered born when they leave the mother's womb and survive for at least one day".
I know what a Caesarean operation is, I was born that way. But the point is, at least our law says absolutely nothing about the way you leave the womb, just requires you to do it. As such, I stand by this: a child isn't alive until it manages to survive outside of another being's body. It makes biological sense for me, it's not just "convenience". And I don't see why that is illogical, please do explain.
And I think you didn't understand what I was saying (or you didn't want to). If there is a law that considers that, under certain circumstances, foetuses can be aborted, I think that allows people who agree to use that right if they want to, and people who don't agree can downright ignore it.
After all, there is another law in the US that allows any judge to order anybody to be executed, under certain circumstances. So a person can decide who can be killed or not. Does that mean that the US is an anarchy?