Ohh, I see what you see. That could easily just be another car, this is a highway after all. But let's say for the sake of argument, it is the airplane. Why wasn't anything similar seen in the first video footage of that video? Surely you would have been able to see something happen, a blur or a flash or some sort, because the "airplane" in the second video seems to flash in the light before hitting the Pentagon. Or at least that's what I notice.
I don't know what you mean by "status," but they are part of the same terrorist act so they are quite similar...
I don't really think their main concern was to cover up any fluids. I mean, if it was to ensure the health and safety of those who frequent the Pentagon on a daily or weekly basis, I highly doubt any of them actually went back to work the next day after something like that happened, haha. I think they covered it up to cover up any evidence against the possibility of an airplane. Simply so that discussions like these can never be settled, because their decision both strengthens my argument and yours at the same time.
I don't know what you mean by "status," but they are part of the same terrorist act so they are quite similar...
I don't really think their main concern was to cover up any fluids. I mean, if it was to ensure the health and safety of those who frequent the Pentagon on a daily or weekly basis, I highly doubt any of them actually went back to work the next day after something like that happened, haha. I think they covered it up to cover up any evidence against the possibility of an airplane. Simply so that discussions like these can never be settled, because their decision both strengthens my argument and yours at the same time.