Aura and I discussed your tournament for a while. He did not understand it (he said it was a horrible concept, although I understood it and tried to explain it). Then, your tournament looked empty, so I tried to make it look larger and neater than it was by fixing it up with bold tags and stuff. Either way, he still did not like it, as he explains in his closing post why a "close win" is not awarding in his eyes. I wanted it open; however, it did not live up to Aura's standards, and as he is the primary Battle Stadium expert, I trusted his judgment to close it until it may be refined.
I did mention in our PM:
You rushed your post, you should be patient and take our advice. We are here to help. I need to see the first post via PM, not by thread, because you missed things (e.g. discussing the point system, 5 max, prizes, etc).
The concept was a bit weird (why award those who lose 5 Pokemon, anyways?) but different (which is good, but not executed quite right), as you should award the person with the lowest amount of fainted Pokemon. That demands for more skill than to win with the highest amount of fainted Pokemon. Aura felt like this as well, albeit stronger.
Abuse power?
Even if you reverse the concept, Aura believed that it would become a standard tournament then.
It broke the quality rule, it seems. I asked Horizon about the decision to close your tournament but he did not like it either. Do discuss it with us + Barbie. :(