(Sorry for taking so long to respond... I was genuinely thinking about it.)
You seem to simply be saying: "your form of morality cannot coexist with traditional morality". This is greatly missing the point. The purpose of my idea is not to provide an empirical basis for traditional morality, but rather to create an entirely new form of morality based on objective reality.
So, yes, in your thought experiment according to my idea, letting the adults live is probably better. Under ideal circumstances, we would feed both, but regrettably the premise doesn't allow it.
So in conclusion, I'm not trying to conform to regular morality, bur rather to create a new morality to replace "regular" morality.
You seem to simply be saying: "your form of morality cannot coexist with traditional morality". This is greatly missing the point. The purpose of my idea is not to provide an empirical basis for traditional morality, but rather to create an entirely new form of morality based on objective reality.
So, yes, in your thought experiment according to my idea, letting the adults live is probably better. Under ideal circumstances, we would feed both, but regrettably the premise doesn't allow it.
So in conclusion, I'm not trying to conform to regular morality, bur rather to create a new morality to replace "regular" morality.