Okay, I'll have a read.
Something about losing brain cells. Good start.
Here's one bit which talks about how the Switch is a "new era". Then it ends off with "but it's not a replacement" (with no justification), and you, yet again, lament our ignorance.
Youcontinue on some post about how the Switch is just a rebranded Wii U. Ignore the fact that the Wii U is not a handheld - that would be a detriment to your point.
You perfectly exhibit the logical fallacy of begging the question in a comment on this one post I see on backwards compatibility. "My conclusion is X, therefore Y." - "This is a third pillar, therefore obviously it's not backwards compatible". But I much prefer the comment where you say "Watch as people give a valid criticism on how my point here is stupid." ... Just zero explanation on why they're wrong or anything. It seems like such a reasonable criticism. I wouldn't even mind but you're talking to me like this is a source of education.
Over on Disquis you ooze with even more superiority than you do here. It's unbelievable. On Disquis you surround yourself with validation, and then when you go somewhere where people actually disagree with you, you link to Disquis like it's some kind of hub for educated people. You never actually make an argument anywhere.
Well that's time I'll never get back. Can I have a valid criticism of the stance now? Sorry if this was a bit rough around the edges, but I can't help but feel like you've been a bit condescending in the thread, in this message and on Disquis. I don't see any actual criticisms yet. Not one. Just explain it to us instead of linking to places.
Something about losing brain cells. Good start.
Here's one bit which talks about how the Switch is a "new era". Then it ends off with "but it's not a replacement" (with no justification), and you, yet again, lament our ignorance.
Youcontinue on some post about how the Switch is just a rebranded Wii U. Ignore the fact that the Wii U is not a handheld - that would be a detriment to your point.
You perfectly exhibit the logical fallacy of begging the question in a comment on this one post I see on backwards compatibility. "My conclusion is X, therefore Y." - "This is a third pillar, therefore obviously it's not backwards compatible". But I much prefer the comment where you say "Watch as people give a valid criticism on how my point here is stupid." ... Just zero explanation on why they're wrong or anything. It seems like such a reasonable criticism. I wouldn't even mind but you're talking to me like this is a source of education.
Over on Disquis you ooze with even more superiority than you do here. It's unbelievable. On Disquis you surround yourself with validation, and then when you go somewhere where people actually disagree with you, you link to Disquis like it's some kind of hub for educated people. You never actually make an argument anywhere.
Well that's time I'll never get back. Can I have a valid criticism of the stance now? Sorry if this was a bit rough around the edges, but I can't help but feel like you've been a bit condescending in the thread, in this message and on Disquis. I don't see any actual criticisms yet. Not one. Just explain it to us instead of linking to places.