• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
Star-Lord
Reaction score
304

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • 1. Oh well *shrugs* I guess I can't satisfy everyone, can I?
    2. That's not civil. You just put fancy words in something called an ad hominem.
    3. There is no level of paranoia in his post. I would love for you to explain what it is.

    I misunderstood, I'll take that one back. Perhaps if you didn't send three tiny messages at a time your message would have made more sense.
    1. I back my ideas with facts and logic.
    2. No you have not.

    This is what I was referring to specifically by the way. Calling your opponent mentally unsound is disgusting.
    3. It is perfectly healthy behaviour to have an opinion. If you actually read my response instead of grunting your way to my profile to whine, you would realize that his opinion is completely sound. He's basically saying that men shouldn't be told that they shouldn't rape people because that's like telling a dog that they shouldn't bite people and it is derogatory and disgusting.

    P.S. didn't you say you weren't going to talk to me again? lmao
    That could explain it, too. xD

    OH Finals. Ugh, I love finals. In the sense of once they're done, you get a mental break for a while.
    I do, but I do hope you'll at least look at the article I linked. It doesn't really have anything to do with MRA or feminism other than it illustrates what I'm trying to say about reaching out to people. For me, an argument is almost always about trying to come to an understanding. I want the other person to understand my reasons for believing what I do, and I want to understand their reasons, and then I try to reconcile them where possible and agree to disagree where not possible.

    I get that it's easy to get emotional about a topic you care a lot about, and if that's the case, I'm not going to ask you to argue with me on a topic if you think it's not going to accomplish anything but ill will. I just think that, generally speaking, people don't feel strongly about things unless they have at least a few good reasons that would make sense to a reasonable, well-meaning person, and there's a lot of strong feelings on both sides of this debate, to be sure. For my part, I think I do misunderstand at least a decent amount of what the "other side" is advocating here (I don't exactly get a lot of exposure to this issue outside of the communities I'm a part of, unfortunately). I do try to acknowledge when I've made bad assumptions and concede when I'm obviously wrong on something.
    Feel free. But unlike you, I maintain a formal attitude that, in turn, does not make me look like a buffoon. Perhaps your consistent attacks will prove to be more of a harm than helpful, as others will view them as attacks as opposed to witty responses. I will leave you with that.
    I dislike double posting, but here is what I have to say on this matter.


    I am willing to accept that a single person dislikes my manner of speaking, because they are one person who is overreacting. If you don't like it, too bad. Since nobody has had a problem with it before, perhaps it is you that is the problem, and not me.
    Actually, no, I shouldn't. Regardless of your trolling behaviour I have kept consistent face because that is what I do. If you read through my previous posts you will discover that I hold a very similar "attitude". Again, very few other people have a problem with it. I'm sorry that it offends you, but I will not change for a vocal minority that is over reacting.
    I understand that. Don't worry, I get it. However, there is also the concept that it is based on the aggregate opinion as opposed to a minority, because sometimes, the minority will claim things that the aggregate opinion disagrees with. You two are the only two that have disagreed with my disposition, out of many others who have posted in the thread. I will not change this "attitude" as you call it to compensate for a minority that is overreacting.

    In addition, if anyone shouldn't be using the attitude excuse, it's you. On multiple occasions you talked down to me, brushed me off, acted like an immature fool and acted like a general ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. So please don't tell me how I should act, especially considering that you are much worse.
    One week? o-o Nice!
    The schedule of school years get away from me these days..
    Is that Spring Break or?
    I am being very blunt, neutral voiced and to the point. There is no problem with my attitude, although I do have the right to call you out on your fallacies and "trolling". If you don't like it, perhaps it is yourself and Valoo getting a little huffy, since other people don't seem to have a problem.
    Biography
    I am not a homosexual!


    i dont belieb u -w-


    Mooogles, It's Drew, I hope college and such is going well for you these days. c:
    While finally you have formed a post that isn't terrible, your point is still invalid. First off, you do not cite anything that proves your point. Second, it is fueled by anger and mistrust for the majority, as opposed to trying to fix any sort of problem.

    Historically peaceful protest promotes understanding and compassion which are things that eventually eliminate segregation. It takes a longer time than just being aggressive towards the opposition or something stupid like that, but integration is never an easy process, and it takes generations to be able to eliminate toxic cultural practices. Instilling fear by violence only encourages the majority to hate the minorities even more. However, we have made great strides in the right direction. The future only holds more.

    Your refined post is a decent effort but it lacks substance.
    I understand you are but that doesn't mean that you are no less of a despicable piece of ♥♥♥♥ that doesn't belong in the D&D section. As such, my opinion still stands.
    Which further shows that you are nothing but an ignorant sackheap. I wish the mods would already just ban you out of the D&D section because it is clear that you are not mature enough to engage there. In addition, the fact that you engage every single one of my posts clearly shows that your "not caring" is flat out a lie. Honestly, I believe that you're getting quite upset behind that computer of yours.

    Try harder.
    I had given up, too. But the whole "gay people should acclimate to this imaginary utopia that exists in my head" argument bothers me so incredibly much.
    Please continue to be completely misogynistic and ignorant because you're really setting up a good example for yourself. Feminist my ass.

    Also, while I keep ♥♥♥♥ in the thread, you took your spite to your signature. Please go learn how to be an adult and try again.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top