Synaesthesia

Honey, what did you think the brownies were for? ;)

Baking brownies with a few...special ingredients. ;) You?

You would say that, sugar daddy.

You're my boy toy, so yes you do.

Let's go camping. btw, you were supposed to pick the avatar where the camper was happy...you know...like he won the battle. You picked the face for when he loses. And I don't permit losers.

Yeah I agree with that. I just meant that I'm going to stop "arguing" with you because as we've both said there is no definitive proof so there's no reason in debating who's opinion is right.

Well to finish this up then, what I meant when saying status was the status of the building. The Pentagon is much more secretive, so they could just be being overprotective. Either way you look at it there is no definitive proof.

It's a little hard to explain exactly what it looks like, so I'll try to give "directions". Do you see what looks like a ramp off a highway, elevated from the rest? You can see a truck driving by, but before it there is another object coming by at a downward angle. That's what I theorize as the plane. The status of the Pentagon and the Twin Towers are completely different, which could be a reason for the confiscation of the tapes. As for the sand, that is interesting. Could it be used to suck up any possible gasoline or other fluids?

I do live in the U.S. but I try not to use that as a factor. If you watch the second part of the video closely, you can actually see the plane. It comes from the top left and right as it leaves view the explosion happens. Also, I fail to see how science comes into this. There is no forensic proof, so it just comes down to my beliefs vs yours.

Let me ask you one question. When a plane explodes do you expect it to stay together? You said it would stick out but that wouldn't be the case if it exploded. There is debris in the video, and I'm willing to bet even more went inside the Pentagon.The person however is interesting. They don't move until well after the explosion occurs, I'd say at least two or three seconds. Instinctively a human would run when they heard a sound that loud, why didn't they? I wouldn't call this evidence for anyone's case, as we don't know why the person acted in the manner in which they did. The video is on your side but gives absolutely no evidence to help either side.

That's not a motive. Bush may have been a complete idiot but he wasn't heartless. No matter how corrupt the government may have been they weren't bad enough to kill thousands of innocents. That's something only people with psychological issues would even consider okay. The only examples I can think of are extremists ,and Bush's administration was not extremist. This video is against the plane actually hitting, but read some of the comments. That camera that filmed the video has a horrible picture quality and frame rate, so how could one possibly expect it to catch a plane at 500mph? It's ludicrous to expect a camera that can't even show the explosion fully catch the plane as it hits.

I had my reasons - to avoid any debatable arguments from starting up in that thread.

I mightn't agree with what you posted but I certainly disagree more with people deleting my posts.

My posts are special guys.

Do you honestly believe what you posted in the 9/11 thread? Simple logic proves those theories wrong, and there's even a video on youtube showing the Pentagon getting hit.

Well, you don't talk to me, nor get on MSN, anymore... =C

I ish ignoured... =C

You seem to be one of the last 'real' members on PC. I respect that.

That you do. ;)

Will you buy me things?

that's kinda sexy, ngl