I don't lock threads if I don't like somebody. There are few people on PC that I dislike and even then, if they were to have posted a thread in Other Entertainment, I would not have locked it unless it was spam, in the wrong section and a thread in the right section was already posted, or it was something that broke the rules.
I locked two threads you made in Other Entertainment. One was your fault, the other was not.
The "What do you dream about at night" thread, located here was locked due to there already being a thread in the proper off topic forum. Whether it was Other Voting Polls or Other Chat I don't remember. It's been a while since I locked that. I replied stating this to the thread, which should explain it right there to you. A topic asking about what you dream about does not relate to television, movies, books, music, or celebrities.
I already explained why I locked the Michael Jackson thread. Threads are allowed to be open for discussion for one month prior to the last reply. If I was the one to have replied last and that post was posted on September 3rd, anything posted past October 3rd would not be allowed and would be bumping an inactive thread, which was what happened to your thread. That thread, however, wasn't locked because of you but because of the one who revived the thread.
That should explain to you well enough why the threads were locked. Now please stop bothering me about it as it is growing to become irritating. When a thread is locked, the moderator is usually required to reply stating why it was locked. I did so, so you should not have had to ask me this. Read the replies next time instead of obviously ignoring them.