Guy

Either kiss me, or kill me.

No. We still have the furniture to move. D:

Nice. XP

Okay, cool. Thanks for answering. :3

& A very orange hero companion. <3

I have to write an essay, citing 3 credible, peer reviewed sources as well as my textbook, about the Ukrainian election of 2004 and the Geographic pattern it created. I have to explain what it is and why it came to be that way.

I just did seven truckloads yesterday. Man, I'm tired.

*looks*

But that's ok, I am not the fastest VM replier myself. =p

Ah, okay; I guess there goes my "fangirl-ism ness!" *throws fanfic about spiderman and green goblin away*

And ZOMG batman; that's a real nice avie you have. :3 Is it true that you defeated Count Dracula? =O Cause there was a movie about that; I think it was rated "R" :3

I wanted to be Robin. :X
...Or batgirl if I can find a nice avie. :3

\o/

No worries, good fellow~ Tis all good ^^

I'm debating on whether or not to even do this assignment. 5% of my total grade, though, but it's due today and I just.... I DON'T know what to write at ALL. =/

Not saying that the active members are any less deserving, but don't you think the banned members deserve the chance to win if their time in 2010, cut short by the ban, results in them being voted for?

Should active users be considered any more eligible than if no active user is truly worthy of that title? I'm not trying to champion the cause for just anyone, I just think it's unfair that they not be considered for it if their truncated time at PC has resulted in being voted for. (They had to just do a whole lot more to get a vote over a non banned user...and it is highly unlikely that people will vote for that person, for the same actions that caused their ban...I'm fairly sure that the ban reason would not be related in any way to the categories they'd be nominated for...at least 9/10 times.)

... What a colorful bio! :D;

That's okay. I kinda got the jist when I saw Sydian post. You may want to mention that.

http://www.pokecommunity.com/showpost.php?p=6319772&postcount=155

thoughts.

MotY Question: Does the "No Voting For Yourself" rule apply if I created my favorite emblem...?

I would like to openly contest AND PROTEST the MotY rule about voting for banned users, it is indeed unfair, as those users did indeed have an impact on the community, regardless of how much we don't want to admit it. They deserve the same recognition as anyone else does, and erasing them completely is impossible. It's one thing to erase what they said/posted as a way to keep the peace or discourage their actions, but refusal to allow members to recognize the impact they had on the community is completely unfair. This is especially the case for people who have been temporarily banned for offenses that were largely unrelated to any categories. Some people have more run-ins with the law than others...that doesn't necessarily make them any more a bad person than it does the next, nor does that make them ineligible to be mentioned as someone who had an impact on PC, but just somehow managed to get on the wrong side of the rules a few times too many.

Naturally I feel that banned members won't likely win any category except maybe the 'bad' ones which point out the most 'questionable' or dodgy members. Maybe they could win a humorous category, which is certainly no endorsement of the actions leading to their banning, whatever those may be.

You know that you're going to get all of the MOTY questions because you posted it, right? :D

I have a question about the MOTY thread you posted.
Do we just copy and paste the whole thing and then post it, or PM it? I got confused about this.

i don't understand.

HAVE YOU DONE IT YET?