Mind you, Catcher in the Rye is by someone who actually knew what he was doing. (I'm pretty sure A Clockwork Orange doesn't follow this kind of idea. Just odd narrative style.) It's one thing to do it intentionally. It's another to use it as an excuse for bad writing.
Essentially, it comes down to something like this: Would you tolerate someone pulling an E.E. Cummings (without actually knowing what that stylistic choice does) and then claim after the fact that it's completely intentional? Likewise, would you want someone to completely ignore the quotation mark for no apparent reason and then claim that they're emulating James Joyce?
Point is, yes, there's works out there that use certain styles of narrative, but that's really only after you learn how to do things through standard format. You can't really use "this is first person" as an excuse to pretty much ignore the laws of English grammar unless you actually know what you're doing. Otherwise, you won't actually learn how to properly do things, so when you try your hand at any other style, it just won't come off well.