5th Gen 3 on 3 BATTLES!!!!

[Joeyjoe9876]

heh. doesn't sound too complex but I don't really like the idea of it. 2v2 is enough if you ask me

 

[MistahDude]

Quoted for truth.

I thought this was a terrible idea at first because I kinda' hate double battles, but then I realized the reason I hate double battles is because it's tough pairing just two Pokémon that compliment each other. I think 3v3 will work way better than doubles.

It'll also play more like traditional RPG's where you have full parties to work with. This makes me think we'll see more cleric types like Blissey in the new gen.

I wonder if we'll get a Triples Battle version of Plusle and Minun...

Gear + Plusle + Minun = Super high power!??

 

[@World]

IMO it's a bit too crowded looking...
But it'll be fun for sure :D . We'll need many new combos. I just hope there isn't a triple gym leader, taking on three annoying Pokémon isn't fun.
Also how would that work in routes? You need three trainers to see you at the same time? Or like with the twins? hm...

 

[Hibaru]

IMO it's a bit too crowded looking...
But it'll be fun for sure :D . We'll need many new combos. I just hope there isn't a triple gym leader, taking on three annoying Pokémon isn't fun.
Also how would that work in routes? You need three trainers to see you at the same time? Or like with the twins? hm...

Me too. Tate and Liza is really giving me a headache too. Double Gym is a bit risky.

 

[war rock exe]

Its the worst idea ever!!!!
Why... why would they make it double battles are epic no more needed.
Whats next pokebrawls?

lol pretty soon all siix pokemon will be fighting at the same time. lol

 

[Pokeyomom]

I think the increased possibilities mean people will get a big starting advantage. If you throw in 2 to 3 strong, you are well on your way to oblitirating them lol. I dunno. I think it will be fun.

 

[superpika237]

Personally, I think it's pretty cool. I mean, considering you throw out half your team, it could make those battles go by even faster than double battles did. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a triple battle gym leader!

 

[hever]

lol pretty soon all siix pokemon will be fighting at the same time. lol

That would be really complicated.

 

[Dark knight17]

Its good idea but the battle might take to long, and im very impatient

 

[Infinity Mk.II]

Sending 3 against 3 at once doesn't sound right, it would be just too crowded...

On the other hand, a way they could make this awesome is that they allow you to send as many pokemon you'd like up to three.
THAT is something I'd have wanted since RSE.

An even more interesting execution of that would be being able to send and recall pokemon mid-battle without necesary replacing. Turning ANY battle into a possible double, triple, or outnumbered battle, instead of being a silly gimmick that shows up a few times in-game. But that'd require some crazy rules as it could be broken very easilly.

 

[SargeantMajorKururu]

I think 3 on 3 would be cool. I mean, I like to lay RPGs with 3 vs However-many or even 4 vs However-many, so that doesn't get me too mad.

 

[hever]

Golden Sun has it, and I'm guessing GF wanted to implement it to please different spectrums of preference.

 

[Åzurε]

Why do Pokemon battles in the style of Disgaea sound like such a good idea?

It's interesting, anyway. I'll have to try it before I have a real opinion.

 

[Ruin Maniac]

It should be quite good but I think it will also be very confusing, especially competitive battling

 

[Abyssumi]

It should be quite good but I think it will also be very confusing, especially competitive battling

surf and earthquake hitting pokemon individually will be a nightmare on time and wat are we meant to do if EVERY POKEMON IN THE BATTLE has intimidate? i do not want to see "_____s intimidate lowers _____s attack" 30 times!

 

[dante1w]

3on3 battels gr8 i will love to play this game as well

 

[CptnSmonge]

GF keeps adding more pokemon to the battlefield but they haven't given me the thing I've wanted since RBY--a fifth move slot. Before people say that would make it too easy, I know I heard a Golden Sun reference here or there. Count the moves you can do there...
A 3-on-3 battle sounds like something I'd do for the novelty of it, but I hope it wouldn't be something forced too much in-game (ie: Eterna Forest, Stark Mountain etc...). Hopefully you can force singles battles like in DPP.

 

[thewinna]

if you had a good team you could pwn. how would the trainers look like. 3 peoples blocking your way.
for friend battles it terrable, because half of your team could go down in a single hit. :(

 

[Balloken]

I think this idea is great! GF has added this, and it's going to be a perfectly good attempt at balancing without Buffing/Nerfing already made moves and pokemon!

I assume there will be special moves to counter Earthquake and such. I think that this will make some pokemon a little more effective in battle (And with the guesses om moves, I think there will be a class of pokemon that primarily use moves that heal and defend!) and probably mean that battles get a little more interesting.

Also, I assume all the whiners are like that because their team might not be as good, and they'll have to rebuild their winning stratagy.

 

[DarkAlucard]

I like the idea but if only you battle 3vs3 on some important moments, a gym battle, a fight with team rock...with the new villans, the battle for the championship, etc.