Baby Pokemon defined by the TCG are Pokemon that a pre-evolved forms introduced after thier evolutions (e.g. all of these except Togepi and Riolu). But I, and most people seem to, think the breeding definition is better. Which is that any Pokemon that can't lay an egg, but's evolutions can, is a baby.
Anyway, yes I like baby Pokemon. My favourite would be Munchlax I think. It's also welcome because a Snorlax hatching out of an egg is a little weird. I don't like Happiny, I mean Chansey should have a baby, it's a little powerful to not have evolved, but Happiny just looks ugly imo.
I also like Tyrogue, mainly because it links the Hitmons together. Chimecho needed an evolution, badly. And yet it got a baby, what's up with that?
What I don't like about baby Pokemon is general, is the incense stuff. They should have just retconned the babies in imo.
Anyway, yes I like baby Pokemon. My favourite would be Munchlax I think. It's also welcome because a Snorlax hatching out of an egg is a little weird. I don't like Happiny, I mean Chansey should have a baby, it's a little powerful to not have evolved, but Happiny just looks ugly imo.
I also like Tyrogue, mainly because it links the Hitmons together. Chimecho needed an evolution, badly. And yet it got a baby, what's up with that?
What I don't like about baby Pokemon is general, is the incense stuff. They should have just retconned the babies in imo.