Following the Leader......with my Greatest (YGO)

[Forci Stikane]

......*sigh* I've come to terms with the fact that chances of my playing the game in real life again have pretty much dropped to around 0%, so I see no more reason against posting this: my main deck, which has brought me through quite a few (minor) tournaments (though it's been updated for the new banlist on WC07):

Monsters:

Tributes: 4
1x Jinzo
1x Blowback Dragon (<3)
1x Goldd, Wu-Lord of Dark World
1x The Fiend Megacyber

Non-Tributes: 17
2x Blade Knight
2x Exiled Force
1x DD Warrior Lady
1x DD Assailant
1x Don Zaloog
2x Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer (<3)
1x Marshmallon
1x Magician of Faith
1x Mask of Darkness
1x Mystic Swordsman LV2
1x Neo-Spacian Grand Mole
1x Reflect Bounder
1x Sangan
1x Treeborn Frog

Spells: 14
1x Brain Control
1x Card Destruction
2x Enemy Controller
1x MST
1x Pot of Avarice
1x Premature Burial
1x RotA
1x Scapegoat
2x Shield Crash
1x Swords of Revealing Light
1x United We Stand
1x Mage Power

Traps: 5
1x Call of the Haunted
1x Crush Card Virus
1x Magic Cylinder
1x Mirror Force
1x Nightmare Wheel

A bit random & outdated, I know, but it has suited me VERY well in the past.

 

[Frostweaver]

Somehow I find the lack of Torrential Tribute the first weird thing ever, then i saw nightmare wheel and... fiend megacyber? wow people use that since cyber dragon came out? >>;

Random is right... but guess that we need to test it in play one day to see if it really works or not, ehehehe ^w^

 

[Alter Ego]

Uhh...yeah, I'm going to have to admit that I don't quite follow your gameplan here. A betadown with Nightmare Wheel and no Cyber Dragons? And why Megacyber? Why use a solitary dark world monster when you only have one discard outlet? Heck, why use Card Destruction when you can't exploit it with anything but that one Goldd and possibly Treeborn? (Come to think of it, wtf is Nightmare Wheel doing in the same deck as Treeborn anyway?) I'm not too wild about Blade Knight either, and Crush Card seems like a bit of a dubious choice for a deck that only has two viable tributes for it, and that's not getting into the whole 'Jinzo + Continuous traps' thing either and Mask on a deck with so few traps (...only half of which are even worth recurring) to me this just looks all too situational and tormented by inner conflict. x.x

So yeah...care to elaborate on your grand masterplan? I'm not seeing it. T_T

 

[crazy101]

u need a deck that will give u a better strategy or u'll lose

 

[Frostweaver]

u need a deck that will give u a better strategy or u'll lose

And honestly, both of your posts on 2 deck fixes simply state that an immediate fix or a major change is needed, but you next state what... any expansion on your views?

 

[Forci Stikane]

Somehow I find the lack of Torrential Tribute the first weird thing ever, then i saw nightmare wheel and... fiend megacyber? wow people use that since cyber dragon came out? >>;

Random is right... but guess that we need to test it in play one day to see if it really works or not, ehehehe ^w^

Torrential has always been kind of......"ew" in my opinion. When I'm on a roll and killing the field (as actually happens quite a bit) it's pretty much a dead card, since Exiled is the only quick-summon monster that might be a threat and it goes through regardless. Nightmare Wheel has actually saved me more times than I can count.

As for Megacyber vs Cyber, well...to be honest, I've personally always believed Megacyber to be more useful in general. 100 more ATK is good, but the part that I really like is that it doesn't require you to have an empty field. For example, if Spirit Reaper is sitting out there alone on the field, I can't do a thing with Cyber Dragon because Reaper being there ruins its summoning conditions. However, if my opponent swarms with their own Cyber and two more monsters, I can go ahead and toss Megacyber out while leaving Reaper or whoever alone, then kill their Cyber Dragon with that extra 100 ATK. I can also pick to tribute or not to, should my lone monster be a Sangan...

As for topdecking, I'll gladly take a 4-star 2000 ATK monster in Blade Knight.

(Yes, the above situation has actually happened to me more than once before. However, Cyber Dragon IS sided.)

Uhh...yeah, I'm going to have to admit that I don't quite follow your gameplan here. A betadown with Nightmare Wheel and no Cyber Dragons? And why Megacyber? Why use a solitary dark world monster when you only have one discard outlet? Heck, why use Card Destruction when you can't exploit it with anything but that one Goldd and possibly Treeborn? (Come to think of it, wtf is Nightmare Wheel doing in the same deck as Treeborn anyway?) I'm not too wild about Blade Knight either, and Crush Card seems like a bit of a dubious choice for a deck that only has two viable tributes for it, and that's not getting into the whole 'Jinzo + Continuous traps' thing either and Mask on a deck with so few traps (...only half of which are even worth recurring) to me this just looks all too situational and tormented by inner conflict. x.x

So yeah...care to elaborate on your grand masterplan? I'm not seeing it. T_T

Cyber Dragon vs Megacyber is already explained above. As for Goldd, that's basically leftovers from the deck's previous form (Sept. 2006 banlist, including Graceful and maybe a random Stein). Card Destruction is there as essentially the only "reliable" draw spell left, outside of PoA. CCV is pretty much the same as Goldd, Treeborn is there for a "A or B" sort of thing (it's kind of hard to explain, actually...), same with Jinzo, and see above for Blade Knight. I am open for suggestions over Goldd & Card Destruction.

"Tormented by inner conflict," huh? Hmm......perhaps that's why it comes out so well ^_^. It's weird, but I actually work the best with random decks like this. "Harmony from Chaos" I suppose.

u need a deck that will give u a better strategy or u'll lose

And you need to come up with a better post or you'll fail. This deck already wins duels.