• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Is the Universe a hologram?

14,092
Posts
14
Years
  • A team of physicists has provided some of the clearest evidence yet that our Universe could be just one big projection.

    In 1997, theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena proposed that an audacious model of the Universe in which gravity arises from infinitesimally thin, vibrating strings could be reinterpreted in terms of well-established physics. The mathematically intricate world of strings, which exist in nine dimensions of space plus one of time, would be merely a hologram: the real action would play out in a simpler, flatter cosmos where there is no gravity.

    Maldacena's idea thrilled physicists because it offered a way to put the popular but still unproven theory of strings on solid footing — and because it solved apparent inconsistencies between quantum physics and Einstein's theory of gravity. It provided physicists with a mathematical Rosetta stone, a 'duality', that allowed them to translate back and forth between the two languages, and solve problems in one model that seemed intractable in the other and vice versa. But although the validity of Maldacena's ideas has pretty much been taken for granted ever since, a rigorous proof has been elusive.

    In two papers posted on the arXiv repository, Yoshifumi Hyakutake of Ibaraki University in Japan and his colleagues now provide, if not an actual proof, at least compelling evidence that Maldacena's conjecture is true.

    In one paper, Hyakutake computes the internal energy of a black hole, the position of its event horizon (the boundary between the black hole and the rest of the Universe), its entropy and other properties based on the predictions of string theory as well as the effects of so-called virtual particles that continuously pop into and out of existence. In the other, he and his collaborators calculate the internal energy of the corresponding lower-dimensional cosmos with no gravity. The two computer calculations match.

    "It seems to be a correct computation," says Maldacena, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and who did not contribute to the team's work.

    The findings "are an interesting way to test many ideas in quantum gravity and string theory", Maldacena adds. The two papers, he notes, are the culmination of a series of articles contributed by the Japanese team over the past few years. "The whole sequence of papers is very nice because it tests the dual [nature of the universes] in regimes where there are no analytic tests."

    "They have numerically confirmed, perhaps for the first time, something we were fairly sure had to be true, but was still a conjecture — namely that the thermodynamics of certain black holes can be reproduced from a lower-dimensional universe," says Leonard Susskind, a theoretical physicist at Stanford University in California who was among the first theoreticians to explore the idea of holographic universes.

    Neither of the model universes explored by the Japanese team resembles our own, Maldacena notes. The cosmos with a black hole has ten dimensions, with eight of them forming an eight-dimensional sphere. The lower-dimensional, gravity-free one has but a single dimension, and its menagerie of quantum particles resembles a group of idealized springs, or harmonic oscillators, attached to one another.

    Nevertheless, says Maldacena, the numerical proof that these two seemingly disparate worlds are actually identical gives hope that the gravitational properties of our Universe can one day be explained by a simpler cosmos purely in terms of quantum theory.

    This story originally appeared in Nature News.

    Would an alternative method of creation of the universe actually change anything? Does it actually matter? What would this say about the standard model of physics?
     
    14,092
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • If the universe is a hologram... who is projecting it?


    Nobody's projecting it per say, it's a byproduct of the extra dimensions(al) strings (String Theory), overlapping, at least in my understanding. This type of thing is really confusing, I could be wrong. XD
     

    Leo the Lion

    Too many sexy people in this world, all of them fi
    101
    Posts
    10
    Years
    • Seen Jul 16, 2016
    Some time ago I read a book, which said: "Maybe this world is just the chimera of a dragon"
    It made me think. What if some VERY advanced civilization made a sort of videogame like the sims? It sounds weird, but.. How can we know if its false or true? Maybe they use this as an experimentation game. And maybe, all the other posible relative universes are just a variation of this "game". Or maybe THIS universe is a variation of that "game".
    That opens tons of posibilities, like a pokemon universe (maybe inspired by the pokemon idea, someone made it), a magical universe, a nazi universe, the Earth being an alien colony and us being slaves, ...
    Yup, I´m feeling preeety crazy today :)
     

    LoudSilence

    more like uncommon sense
    590
    Posts
    10
    Years
    • US
    • Seen Aug 7, 2016
    IMO this means little; what bearing could this possibility have on our lives in a practical sense? I understand furthering the cause of science and discovery and all that, but on a societal level, this doesn't really change anything.
     

    Mark Kamill

    I like kitties
    2,743
    Posts
    11
    Years
    • Age 31
    • Seen Jun 13, 2023
    It does further any sense of futility in our lives, that's for sure. No greater beyond, just a passing into nothingness, our existence a mere negligible happenstance. Pretty damn important if you ask me.
     

    LoudSilence

    more like uncommon sense
    590
    Posts
    10
    Years
    • US
    • Seen Aug 7, 2016
    It does further any sense of futility in our lives, that's for sure. No greater beyond, just a passing into nothingness, our existence a mere negligible happenstance. Pretty damn important if you ask me.

    How so? If you believe God exists, this doesn't nullify His existence in any way. Perhaps this is the way He created the universe.
     

    Mark Kamill

    I like kitties
    2,743
    Posts
    11
    Years
    • Age 31
    • Seen Jun 13, 2023
    Even worse, then it would diminish our creation even more, as we could then be technically duplicate by His own account without any cosmic repercussions.
     

    Bartholomew

    Snug Rungs
    30
    Posts
    10
    Years
  • Would an alternative method of creation of the universe actually change anything? Does it actually matter? What would this say about the standard model of physics?
    I don't see where this has anything to do with the creation of the universe. They're talking simply about how things continue to exist or not exist or appear to exist but don't.

    Mudkip, physicists did tests recently to determine whether or not we were in a simulation. According to them, we're not.

    LoudSilence, while you may care about societal impacts of things, a lot of people don't. A physicist is just as likely to say the opposite about a social incident: what does that have to do with the fabric of space?

    Elendil, this has little to do with what you're talking about. You're talking about living and dying. When we die, we don't go into the "nonexistent state" of matter. That won't happen until far into the future when whatever we're made of is swallowed by a black hole.
     

    Mark Kamill

    I like kitties
    2,743
    Posts
    11
    Years
    • Age 31
    • Seen Jun 13, 2023
    It has everything to do with what I talk about. If the universe is a hologram, then its just an image of an existence. Meaning we might just well be copies. If its a program, a simulation, then we are not souls, but simply mere data that will be gone forever.
     

    LoudSilence

    more like uncommon sense
    590
    Posts
    10
    Years
    • US
    • Seen Aug 7, 2016
    Even worse, then it would diminish our creation even more, as we could then be technically duplicate by His own account without any cosmic repercussions.

    Well, not to get too philosophical here...but if you believe in a purpose of existence, that purpose (and any value attached to it) is determined entirely by the one who designated it (in this case God).

    How insignificant you might feel about it (being a "duplicate" or what have you) doesn't affect the actual significance intended upon your inception. Get what I'm saying?

    LoudSilence, while you may care about societal impacts of things, a lot of people don't. A physicist is just as likely to say the opposite about a social incident: what does that have to do with the fabric of space?

    I meant specifically in regards to the OP; he was asking if it "matters" and if it "changes anything".

    It's a different way of understanding the universe, but practically speaking? It doesn't really change much, no.
     
    5,983
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • I don't think this article has much to do about holograms really. What I got out of it is that is a researcher did two computations in two different models which agreed with each other - which means these two models might be more complementary than competing. Or if you're on Maldacena's side of the debate, there is evidence that the universe can be explained with only 8 dimensions instead of 10, and I guess a la Occam's Razor, it's better to have a model that doesn't involve superfluous dimensions. But it's just one computation, and of course we need more evidence.

    I dropped out of physics long ago, so I really have no idea what it means but for this intuition.
     
    Back
    Top