Well, on the note of why you haven't seen much of me around lately, here's what's up:
I'm currently preparing for the entrance exams to not one but two universities, both of which will be in June. One is a high-end university with harsh exam standards so I'm also enrolled in a prep course to prepare for it. The course has lessons three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday), effectively taking over those days. Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday I have to self-study for the other exam and finish the homework from the prep course, so again not much time to spare. I still try to get on Sundays, but that's also the day I have set aside for odds and ends I didn't have the time to finish on the other six days not to mention it's also supposed to be the day I get some peace and quiet so I don't go into full burnout over the workload.
...that and I got a particularly nasty case of flu this week that left me behind in schedule. Fortunately, this is also a holiday week so I had a bit of extra time to spare to finally go through all the submissions.
So yeah, sorry for the wait everyone, I really am ridiculously busy for the time being. I'll make an effort to get the moderation checked up Sundays, but with my schedule being what it is I can only promise 'when I have the time to spare' right now.
That being said, this state of extreme busy should be over and done with by July, so just hang in there until then. If **** really hits the fan a gentleman in red MIGHT indeed step in to help, but really: don't count on or pester him about it. Any higher staff assistance I get over here is given purely at their discretion.
As far as the discussion on getting another mod goes, well...the moderation process is a high staff matter and not in my jurisdiction. That being said, just rush-recruiting someone to help deal with the load would probably not be a good idea. To begin with, it would have to be a competent and reliable person with some depth of experience on how things are run in this section. In all honesty, I'd also want to break in any assisting mod on a more peaceful period where I can make sure we're both on the same page on how things should be run and they can get used to handling the position. Moderator powers take a bit of adjustment to get used to and make some really nasty messes if they're used carelessly.
On moderation process and comments...yeah, what happened was basically that the people whining about moderation taking too long then came to me and started whining even more about
why their RPs were getting declined. As much as it made sense from a logistical point of view, it really just felt like the punishment was unfairly hitting the good members who actually put time and effort into what they do while having no visible effect on the mindless whiners. I may resort to the hit-and-run decline/approve again from time to time to keep things rolling here, but as a norm I'll at least try to give the comments as well.
As for GMs...that's a term that's been used to describe all kinds of things, really. Usually around here it's used in the capacity of 'game master', which just refers to whoever is hosting the RP you're participating in. But yes, it can also be shorthand for God Mod, so I prefer 'RP master' simply because it's less cluttered with confusing usage.
I honestly do not see how someone else like Loki or Twilight can't approve all the RP submissions. The longer Alter is gone, the more submissions that are going to pile up.
The answer to that would be the same as to why there's thread moderation in the first place: to keep order and standard in the section. Submissions are screened in moderation because otherwise we'd be flooded with spam, misplaced threads, plots that need filler characters to fit the post character minimum and people trying to advertise their own crapshot RPing sites.
The Loki angle has already been covered (and you will note she's never been a blanket approver either), and the notion of bringing in a moderator from a completely different section (even if we ignore the fact they'd have no moderator privileges here) is absurd simply because those moderators DON'T follow the comings and goings of the section and are not guaranteed to have any knowledge of or even interest in RPs and would thus have no idea how they're supposed to be judging the threads. It's also a far more time consuming process than you'd think. See all those threads with the sometimes very long plots lined up in the section? I read through those.
All of those. That's what fair thread moderation requires. Even as a routined reader, I still need upwards from half an hour for the average moderation round. That's not something you can just dump on a person who never signed up to deal with this section begin with.
Rather than complaining about the moderation process, I'd suggest that you repeat the phrase 'I will post my threads in the appropriate subsection' as long as it takes for you to remember it the next time you try to submit something. You seem to be having a bit of trouble with that concept. :\
I agree, Garnet, there should be some consequences for dropping out of a roleplay unannounced. It's really common and can ruin the roleplay for everyone else. People should treat their spot in a roleplay as a responsibility. A reputation system might be a step in the right direction.
I'm wondering, how would a system like that work? Would there be a way to make sure only GMs use it, or should anyone be able to comment on a roleplayer's reputation? Couldn't it be easily abused?
There isn't such a large number of roleplayers on this forum. Maybe reputation could be kept track of informally on one large thread. If someone quit without notice, the GM would tell the thread's creator, and a tick would appear next to the roleplayer's name on the list. Future roleplay creators would be able to judge applicants based on the number of checks.
Alright, I hate to be a cynic but...
...no reputation. Never reputation. Systems like that are always abused; just look at the never ending stream of complaints about reputation abuse in the C Q&A. It would just become another tool for insecure RP masters to pick on whoever disagreed with them, or got into a fight with them, or who did anything they didn't like, and someone would try to implement some kind of demented system with them for their RP and...
...yeah, too abusable. A member vote type system only works if the majority of members use their votes responsibly, and every reputation type system out there is solid evidence for the fact that things just don't work like that. I see it leading to more hurt feelings and quarrels over ticking than anything else.
As far as I can tell, the best you can do abot flaky RPers is keep them in memory. If someone just vanished on you last time then you should take that into consideration when they try to sign up next time. We can have whatever rules and systems we want, but at the end of the day, if RP masters don't act against it then things will stay as they are because people like that will still keep getting accepted into RPs.
I don't really know, just I wonder if it could be pulled off.
It can, and I recall it happening once. That being said, I recall a lot more times when the RP master proudly declared all regions and then the RP tripped up on itself before they got out of Pallet Town. My advice would be don't focus on the length. It's not a virtue in itself and it usually leads to overly airy, long-reach plots that lack the momentum to keep the RP interesting. Approach it from the direction of making an enjoyable RP then just roll with it as far as it will go; it's a lot more fun for everyone that way.
And yeah, with an 'all regions' thing, given how all the regions game-wise are built on the same formula, you'd really have to figure out a way to keep it from becoming the same old same old around the second or third region.