Signature of the Week

[Zebra Thunderhead]

Munna, you obviously don't know how long it takes to get admins to approve an emblem and then the emblem itself. So you should try and understand before you whine and moan about how ugly it looks.

Honestly, you should be thankful we have an emblem for this at all.

 

[Dukey]

Lol. I'm fine with not getting the embem, so w/e.
It's not all bad [the design] maybe different colors though.
No need to change it if it's too much of a burden though, it's good enough ;D

 

[THIRTY-SIX]

I actually don't care if there is one or not. Eventually the allure of getting an emblem will die out and the entries will end up going back to usual. That is if at all there would be a peak as to I want to enter to get an emblem!
Ehh either way is fine with me.
So did you have to create the emblem before the proposal of the emblem?
Also, it's true I don't know… but have you considered this "whining" a crit?
Never really liked the idea in the first place, I mean as I stated before the allure will disappear eventually.
Now it seems as if I'm whining… but I'm not. xD

 

[Zebra Thunderhead]

On a completely unrelated note, I'm pretty sure I've seen Comic Tragedy's entry posted here before, just without the SOTW text...

 

[ruby]

Me too.
CT, please read the rules carefully next time.

Rules:

• Limit: one entry per person.
• Your entry must be relevant to the current theme. Myself, and other members of the graphics community will be the judge of how well your entry relates, if ever it's relevancy should come into question.
• You may edit your banners once you submit them.
• You may not enter if you chose the theme.
• All entries must be made during the SoTW time period. Previously made banners will be disqualified.

 

[Comic Tragedy]

Um. Color Me Evil, I am pretty sure the rules say that you cant submit premade tags into the competitions. :<

The tag you submitted is also in this thread (really old): Post number 16 in your old gallery.

 

[Zebra Thunderhead]

Crap, I posted the wrong link. Dx Thanks for pointing it out.

 

[Comic Tragedy]

No problem! xD

I was just really confuzzled for a moment there.

 

[ruby]

So CT, will you be making a new entry?

Personally I liked the first one you entered better than the disqualified one. :o

 

[Loki]

So did you have to create the emblem before the proposal of the emblem?
Also, it's true I don't know… but have you considered this "whining" a crit?

Have you ever considered that I wasn't looking for your criticisms? <_<
And if the allure's just going to fade away, why do we care whether the emblem looks good or not again? I fail to see this logic.

If this one is better, I'll pester David to upload it, but seriously, no need to diss it if you don't like it. <_<

 

[THIRTY-SIX]

Do vertical tags not break the 500x300 rule?

Also I think CT's tag has a slightly different composition what he had made previously.

I just wanted to post my opinion. Didn't think you'd be so defensive about it. xD

It is better but it still further perpetuates the message that signatures are about random effects without any meaning behind them. Dx

 

[ruby]

Do vertical tags not break the 500x300 rule?

No, I just haven't been on yet silly. Px
I'll contact Tiny, and if it happens again next week I'll start including it in the rules.

Also I think CT's tag has a slightly different composition what he had made previously.

Looks to similar to me, I'm not changing my mind.

It is better but it still further perpetuates the message that signatures are about random effects without any meaning behind them. Dx

There's not a lot you can do with a 80x80 canvas, besides it's just a carrot on a stick really.

 

[Tiny]

aw v tags arent aloud?
i thought it was like 500x300 and 300x500

):

 

[Comic Tragedy]

Wait..... When was I disqualified? This is news to me. Is it the tag I'm using? I'm pretty sure that it doesn't break any size constraints.

 

[Loki]

Do vertical tags not break the 500x300 rule?

Also I think CT's tag has a slightly different composition what he had made previously.

I just wanted to post my opinion. Didn't think you'd be so defensive about it. xD

It is better but it still further perpetuates the message that signatures are about random effects without any meaning behind them. Dx

I don't mind you posting your opinion, but when you insult it and go off saying things like it's uglier than half the other ones unrelated to graphics, I mean... It's not like I was obligated to do this, so I didn't think you'd be so picky about it. D:

Either way, I was going to put a 7 at the end of SotW for 7 days, but then it looked like SotW #7.

But whatever, it didn't win the staff over anyway, so the first one stays. :| Sorry guys.

 

[ruby]

Wait..... When was I disqualified? This is news to me. Is it the tag I'm using? I'm pretty sure that it doesn't break any size constraints.

As I said in my previous post:

Rules:

• Limit: one entry per person.
• Your entry must be relevant to the current theme. Myself, and other members of the graphics community will be the judge of how well your entry relates, if ever it's relevancy should come into question.
• You may edit your banners once you submit them.
• You may not enter if you chose the theme.
• All entries must be made during the SoTW time period. Previously made banners will be disqualified.

- Edit -
​

Screw it; there's no size restrictions now, but please still be considerate of smaller resolutions.

 

[Comic Tragedy]

. . .

My banner was made for the sotw. Are you thinking about me pointing out, color me evil's mess up in posting an old tag?

I guess you could disqualify my second entry because the concept was made like 3 months ago. But I changed my entry back to the first one so.... yeh.

 

[ruby]

I posted that warning before you changed it back.

 

[THIRTY-SIX]

Everyone changing their sigs… Making me want to as well. Dx

 

[Comic Tragedy]

Hah. Well, I pretty much love your entry at the moment. So, you would loose one vote! xD

Oh, well, I guess if you managed to make it better. xD