What about ranked voting? You rank the parties/candidates in order, and if your first choice doesn't win a majority, then your vote goes to your second choice. That way you decide where your vote goes even if your preferred candidate doesn't win.
What about ranked voting? You rank the parties/candidates in order, and if your first choice doesn't win a majority, then your vote goes to your second choice. That way you decide where your vote goes even if your preferred candidate doesn't win.
That sounds good, I'd be okay with that.
That's not true. Obama carried the popular vote with 66 million, while Romney got 61. Not sure which numbers you're using.
You sure you're not thinking of the Bush-Gore election?I was pretty sure it was Romney. Anyways, let us do away with no electoral college stuff.
You sure you're not thinking of the Bush-Gore election?
But yeah, no electoral college please.
Well, we can have a unelected house that is made up of experts who look at the elected houses legislation, and decide if it's really right for the country.
Well, we can have a unelected house that is made up of experts who look at the elected houses legislation, and decide if it's really right for the country.
Doesn't an unelected house like that kind of defeat the purpose of having a democracy in the first place? The government's chief concern should be representing the will of the people and an unelected upper house can't do that.
Now, for those who seem confused, the point of an upper house is to provide another level of scrutiny for any bills that are being pushed through parliament. The idea is that the upper house can go through bills passed by the lower and reject them/point out flaws to produce better quality laws. Whilst I can certainly see the benefit of this, I've seen a lot of stonewalling and political games played through the upper house here and I'm sure that a lot of places have similar issues. With that said, I'd be perfectly okay with a single house.
I like the upper house because it does provide more checks and balances, despite it being more inefficient.
In theory I love the upper house, it's only in practice that I'm less fond of the idea.
Not to mention it would be a bit hard to actually implement a two-house government in this event.