War gives unemployed people jobs
War solved the Great Depression
obvoiusly, War has it's good and bad points
and, it does kind of solve problems. The United Nations pretty much exists to keep countries that pose a threat (to the world) [AKA countries(leaders of them) getting too powerful] in check. If they get too powerful, then the United Nations will go to war wiht the country that happens to pose a theat.
Now, if you're going to argue that it leaves countries in serious debt, we've already solved much as that problem as we've learned from how badly the Treaty of Versailles failed.
Also, just telling someone just to stop doesn't solve anything at all, as seen with Hitler and his rise to power, which is why we go to war more often, for example, with Iraq, and now, taking action with Iran.
To make it simpler, i'll use the traditional cookie example. When a little boy starts bickering about how he wants a cookie, the mom will refuse. Eventually the boy gets on her mom's nerves so much that she gives him a cookie as long as he stops. As people say, he don't learn that he shouldn't bother to get a cookie, he learns that he can get more cookies by bothering his mom.
As for hitler:
Germany takes Austria, League of Nations goes "Just don't do it again"
same goes for the rest of East Europe, they sign a Nonagression treaty with Russia and they're pretty much all set until Germany(or was it Japan...) attacked Russia and it became a "war on 2 fronts"
"War doesn't prove who's right and who's wrong. It proves who's left."
As for this quote, it's mostly not at all to prove who's right or wrong. It's more of to either:
A) Spread influence - (War on Communism) [This is probably the type you're talking about]
B) Get resources - (Imperialization of Africa)
C) Remove a cruel person from power - (Iraq, WWII)
Sure some of them are messed up reasons, but in the end, it DID solve something and it DID have an impact, not saying the impact is always positive, but it DOES make an impact.
As a conclusion, i guess i'd have to say war isn't that bad. Sure, a bunch of lives are lost, but they die fighting for a country that believe in. No one proves that as much as the bunch of the suicide bombers/Kamikaze pilots. It's not like they were forced to do it, it's that they were willing to die for their country.
Final opinion, I'm ok about war. Not that I'm a huge war freak, it's just that i think that wars DO solve things. Not always things that align with my ethics, but it still does works. So in the end, i would rather go for a so-so opinion. Suck that half the polls are : You're totally for it, completely against it, or don't care -_-
Ah, i guess my little rant is over. I really don't like seeing an argument without the other side of it, which is why i REALLY suck at making decisions. So as this side of the argument, i guess i'll leave this.
"If someone were to take something very precious to you, would you take action, or just tell them to stop it?"