I really don't buy the whole "THE YPUT THE DATA IN D/P SO THEY MUST BE MAKING ONE" theory. Games, including Pokemon, put a lot of data in. For franchises that feature some sort of compatibility with other games, it can be seen as a precaution just in case it's needed for future compatibility.
That being said, just because the data is there doesn't mean it'll ever be used. Way back in R/B, Professor Oak was supposed to be a battle. Even though the event that triggered the battle was taken out, Oak still has a team of Pokemon, and hacking can make the battle happen.
Indeed - very true. it's hard to deny that there is date (heck, I've even seen it first-hand myself thanks to friends with hack-power), but it doesn't mean that they will use it.
But it does show one thing - a GS remakes has been seriously considered by them - enough to put the coding in. And it isn't necessary coding either, I don't believe. In the third gen games they didn't put in 'From Orr' beforehand for the Pokemon from Colo/Xd - I think they simply went around not having that set in and programmed into Orre/XD that all Pokemon will just come from a 'Distant Land'. So it wasn't actually necessary to do it, which adds a bit more to it. But as you said - it's far from a guarantee that it'd be made.
And then there's the other things that scream GSC, that shows that they have indeed at least considered it. I hope that the coding will end up seeing some usage, but one shall have to wait and see.
The key item known as the S.S. Ticket is in the coding, but for some reason doesn't ellicit the same responses like "omgzers KANTO REMAKE to the max!" like Johto hints do.
Umm... I actually heard a lot in the way of people suggesting that the third game, one would go to Kanto. >_< Of course, they were wrong...
As for the copyrighting of names, any type of company copyrights random crap all the time for little or no reason. Often to prevent immitators from using similar names.
Also true. And as I believe I said earlier, they don't even have to copyright things as they are a big game company with plenty of $$$ - hence the fact there had been a website domain name for Pokemon Platinum taken by a small forum being no issue for them when they announced the name Platinum. So it really doesn't mean much at all.
It really wouldn't make scense if they made a Johto remake,unless it was for the 20th aniversary.
There is no real reason..Except,maybe,for the fans.
Disagree. FR/LG hadn't been made for for an aniversary primarily, nor primarily that they needed a way to give people certain Pokemon that gen (like how a few, albeit less Pokemon are missing from the 4th gen games that happen to have been found in GSC). But they wouldn't have done FR/LG - a remake game - if they thought it wouldn't have sold and made them money. That's all the reason they need - a promise of making $$$ from a game - and it's by far the sole factor they look into if the product can be made (which it can). A GS remake could easily deliever that - look at the demand!
Plus - they can always use some other aniversary if they want (say ten years since GS or Crystal?).
Was it really better than first generation games? I heard on another website that they sold more copies than the second generation games. Also please do not say that this were the best Pokemon games this will alienate people who like the other Pokemon games.
To be fair, she did say 'in my opinion', so she wasn't forcing that concept onto you or anyone else - just stating what she thought.