5th Gen Unconfirmed Pokemon Thread

Twilite Darkrai said:

I edited my post. They are now 99% confirmed to be fake which makes me VERY VERY HAPPY! :D​

Click to expand...

however, if they are real, GF did a VERY bad job.
anyways, here's a picture i found at PJ:

Twilite Darkrai said:

I have already posted this. ._.
​

Click to expand...

really? didn't saw.
11 days left and we'll know if they are real or not. xD

To be honest, I think Ken can come up with better evos too. I quite like these supposed evos, but I know he can do better.

However, unfortunately (well, for you guys at least), none of this stuff posted above is evidence hard enough to prove them as fake. They most certainly aren't confirmed to be fake yet.

Seriously, if you lot saying "ZOMFG THEYRE SO FAKE YOU GUIZE GET OVER IT!!1!11!1" are wrong, you're all going to look like a bunch of tools.

3rd time I've said this: This thread is full of wishful thinking. It's absolutely hilarious.

These evolutions, even though stated to be confirmed by a "special source" on serebii.net and pokebeach, are most probably fake. First of all, the fire starter evolutions, oh god are you serious? they look pathetic, its like you took the initial starter body and inflated it and added some minor features. And for the grass starter final evolution, I really doubt that a starter having arms and legs will lose them in the preceeding evolution, although I liked Tsutaja's final evo though :D.

YES, so glad they are fake.

Kanto_Johto said:

To be honest, I think Ken can come up with better evos too. I quite like these supposed evos, but I know he can do better.

However, unfortunately (well, for you guys at least), none of this stuff posted above is evidence hard enough to prove them as fake. They most certainly aren't confirmed to be fake yet.

Seriously, if you lot saying "ZOMFG THEYRE SO FAKE YOU GUIZE GET OVER IT!!1!11!1" are wrong, you're all going to look like a bunch of tools.

3rd time I've said this: This thread is full of wishful thinking. It's absolutely hilarious.

Click to expand...

So are you saying that they're not fake? I think its enough evidence, that guy from 2ch made them.

I'm not trying to start an arguement but do you want these to be real?

Twilite Darkrai said:

Well, I didn't see this before, but this seems very believable, although it is a little old.
I don't know why EVERY Pokémon Fan Site have believe it is true just because Pokéxperto's supposed divine sources said it....


http://pokejungle.net/2010/09/01/bw-rumors-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-9320




For me it's enough.
​

Click to expand...

But that Torchic picture was beta art for it. Not some fan-made piece. So really if that person posted that saying they created that Torchic as well, then it's not reliable.

Silver25 said:

But that Torchic picture was beta art for it. Not some fan-made piece. So really if that person posted that saying they created that Torchic as well, then it's not reliable.

Click to expand...

I think he said he wanted to create something similar. That Torchic beta art is original.​

Silver25 said:

But that Torchic picture was beta art for it. Not some fan-made piece. So really if that person posted that saying they created that Torchic as well, then it's not reliable.

Click to expand...

He didn't say he created the Torchic one, he was saying that it was what his inspiration for the way he presented his pics.

#Emochu said:

So are you saying that they're not fake? I think its enough evidence, that guy from 2ch made them.

I'm not trying to start an arguement but do you want these to be real?

Click to expand...

I wont mind if they're real. Like I said, I actually quite like them, but I still think Ken could have done better.

I'm saying there isn't enough evidence to prove they're fake. You people are just getting desperate now.

Ah, alright. Guess I interpreted that differently.

@ Haza, well I agree with you on that, it's strage how many Pokemon blogs actually that this was real, although they did state that there might be a chance its fake.
Anyway, this one "source" seemed to have confirmed it and is claimed to be a trusted source previously by some Pokemon blogs, so I guess this is what got some eyebrows raised.

Yeah, that DS picture going around? Let me show you guys something funny....



Who else remembers the chimecho evo? Ehhhh?

Kanto_Johto said:

I wont mind if they're real. Like I said, I actually quite like them, but I still think Ken could have done better.

I'm saying there isn't enough evidence to prove they're fake. You people are just getting desperate now.

Click to expand...

That guy claimed he made them, would he really lie?

I'm pretty sure GF wouldn't make a Banna Milotic a fat infernape/rhyperior and a Rapidialga ._.

As for the screen shots of the game on DSi, what if they're just viewing an image?

Alright, never tried this before, but I did one of those .gif overlays...
Let's analyze!

Erroranylsis has proven that the site itself was photoshoped on there:
http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/50fa04a/

((I only linked here so that people could read what it is showing. Basically, to sum up nicely, if you save as a .jpeg enough, you'll start to notice a difference in quality areas and where something was saved. Oddly enough, the DS screen isn't, so I am assuming they added the new screen AFTER they filters and curves adjustments. ))

Why would this be so? Because the site on the chimecho is talking about something else, so this makes it a bit more relevant.

Also, the same site... Why photoshop that one?



-Shadow placement of the doll is EXACTLY THE SAME. This would be really freaking hard to pull off...
-The doll in the second image is really blurry. Also, you can still see some noise residue that has been hidden by trying to up the brightness.
-The angle difference is easily explained by skew and transformation tools in photoshop. If you notice, the computer monitor seems much longer in the new image re guarding pokabu's seemingly evolution opposed to the one with chimechos..

Found these on internet: