1) Would it be worth it building your own computer or just paying a premium for a prebuilt one from, say, Dell?
If you can build your own machine, you know all of the contents of the machine and can get exactly what you need for the job. This allows you to use good bang-for-buck parts and warranty the parts individually, rather than send the whole machine to Dell (who are known for horrible consumer warranty). It also means that you don't have extra "features" that you don't need, the ability to upgrade and replace parts more easily in the future (OEMs use proprietary parts which do not play nice with components they weren't made for) and you have a clean install of Windows, without Dell/HP/Acer's bloated software and Norton/McAfee trials leaving traces.
Especially with Windows 7, drivers are found automatically, which was one of the major benefits of OEM machines during the XP era, as they were kept in the one place (although rarely updated - double sword), but anyone who wants to use XP now is just wrong. It's not their choice, they're wrong if they want XP on a new machine. :D
2) How long would it take to construct the actual machine, given that you have all of the parts (not counting installing the OS(es) and applications)?
It depends on exactly how much practise one has. I put a computer together from boxes to on a desk installing Windows in 15-25mins. Installing Windows, drivers (if the need be. You should install the chipset drivers of the motherboard CD and graphics drivers off the website of it's dedicated.) and programs takes the longest, although there's a program called Ninite that can do an automated install on a large range of common programs. You're going to have to sort out Office on your own, though.
In other words, built in under 30 mins, good to go in under 1h30.
I'm tech savy... I just don't know why I don't post here often >__>
Anyways, here's a new face for you all.
I need some opinions of a computer I bought online:
This one
I think it's pretty good, but I have a few questions:
1. Are there any disadvantages to using shared memory versus dedicated? (The video is Intel HD and all shared up to 1.5GB or so)
2. How good exactly is the processor (I've never used Intel before XD)
3. What the hell is Lightscribe?
1. Yes, dedicated offers MUCH better performance. Intel Graphics are the most basic there is, sorry. They're good for playing movies and 2D Games.
2. The i3 is actually quite snappy. They're mid-range simply because the i5s and i7s are better. At 2.26 GHz, it will perform about the same as a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo, but it has Hyperthreading, which can speed up some sort of multitasking/multithreaded apps.
3. Lightscribe essentially lasers a specified image onto the top of a compatible CD or DVD. It's monochrome and a pretty cool gimmick.
If you're intending to do any graphical work or gaming in the future, I'd be returning that and getting something with a better GPU. The higher models of that HP series have an ATI 5650m, which is awesome, but even the 5450m is faaar better than the Intel graphics.
Sorry to be the bringer of bad news.