• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

PC WiFi Tournament

Alakazam17

Alakazam17

[b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Well, seeing as how the Side-Tournies tourned out, I'm not sure if they're a good idea. Though I'll admit the regular tourney was just as bad this summer. So I might give it another go, starting it if and only if 16 people sign up for it.
     
    Ooka

    Ooka

    [font=Maven Pro][color=#A75EE2]Cosmic[/color][/fon
    • 2,626
    Posts
    16
    Years
    I just think it would be helpful to anyone that wanted to participate in the tourney but couldn't due to no Wi-Fi. (Like myself)
     
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Well, I am going to post the semi-final now. Aurasphere will be getting the coveted lucky-loser spot, moving on the semi-final. Because you lost your match, you will be being paired with this quartet of members who don't have their results. XD

    Semi-Final

    _Prince_ VS lazybob5

    Aurasphere VS Xairmo/Dark_Azelf/POKEMASTERALEX/World King's Lugia    ​

    As for Dark_Azelf, Xairmo, POKEMASTERALEX, and World King's Lugia: come Saturday, I won't give any more extensions. I will select the user who has been the most active since I paired you all together, and that'll be it. You will also be able to battle any of the other three people between now and Saturday(ie. POKEMASTERALEX could battle Dark_Azelf or Xairmo if he finds them online while he is). However, this will just take the loser out of the tournament, and I'll still DQ based off activity for the remaining three. Furthermore, if either of the intended battles take place, the winner will move on regardless of activity. XD got that everyone? :D

    I really do not like DQ'ing people based on activity, but I will if I have to come Saturday. So until then, good luck!
     
    Last edited:

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    _Prince_ said:
    Great!

    I just contacted lazybob5, have to wait for his reply now.
    Click to expand...

    He's such a jerk when it comes to PC :P He never logs on, I guess he only really likes battling and not the forum aspect of the place. Well, I see him this weekend so I'll tell him to get his butt on wifi at night to battle you, Prince.
     
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Volkner's Apprentice said:
    He's such a jerk when it comes to PC :P He never logs on, I guess he only really likes battling and not the forum aspect of the place. Well, I see him this weekend so I'll tell him to get his butt on wifi at night to battle you, Prince.
    Click to expand...
    It would be awesome if all of the combatants knew someone like you, Ryan. :D

    And just a notice for those checking: I'll be updating the rules again, mainly adding some new stuff and whatnot. It should be finalized by the end of this Tourney. ^^
     

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Alakazam17 said:
    It would be awesome if all of the combatants knew someone like you, Ryan. :D

    And just a notice for those checking: I'll be updating the rules again, mainly adding some new stuff and whatnot. It should be finalized by the end of this Tourney. ^^
    Click to expand...

    I try. XD It's a pretty easy method. "Hey there! I'm Ryan, be my friend and I'll make you cookies. And kick your butt when you don't finish your battles."

    Might those rules include a new OU/BL/UU legend cap?
     
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    The way it looks I will lessen the legends-ban even further, restricting only the number of OU legends. I'll see how it goes, and decide if it's going to stay for the 7th Tournament.
     

    Aurafire

    provider of cake
    • 5,736
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Really, UU and BL legends are in their respective tiers for a reason....Allowing more than one of these shouldn't alter the competition terribly. It's not like "ZOMG you're using Raikou and Articuno at the same time...how am I supposed to win now?!?!"

    And if they do complain....it's probably because they suck lost. =)
     

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Haha, I agree with that. I mean, limiting OU legends to maybe like, 3 on a team would probably be a perfect idea. Nobody uses like, Azelf/Suicune/Heatran/Zapdos on the same team. People just have a few for support either in tanking, walling, stalling, sweeping, etc. So yeah, three gets my vote :P

    As for UU (Phione and Articuno? Um...) and BL (Hello Regirock, meet STAB Hydro-Pump) they can totally be unrestricted.
     

    _Prince_

    Pikachu?
    • 1,396
    Posts
    17
    Years
    Volkner's Apprentice said:
    He's such a jerk when it comes to PC :P He never logs on, I guess he only really likes battling and not the forum aspect of the place. Well, I see him this weekend so I'll tell him to get his butt on wifi at night to battle you, Prince.
    Click to expand...


    Ok thanks =]

    Hmm...I still think all OU legends should be allowed. They are not more powerful than the current OU pokemon. If they were I think we'd have seen a ban on them, right? k I know I'll never win against you guys anyways...
     

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    _Prince_ said:
    Ok thanks =]

    Hmm...I still think all OU legends should be allowed. They are not more powerful than the current OU pokemon. If they were I think we'd have seen a ban on them, right? k I know I'll never win against you guys anyways...
    Click to expand...

    Well they're all certainly allowed, of course. The problem is, nobody ever uses an entire team of OU legends anyway because they don't all offer the support a team needs to win here (usually.) It shouldn't be a problem to toss the ban on at about three OU's per team, that gives people the chance to still use like Suicune, Heatran, and Azelf on the same squad if they wanted to while still keeping it "fair".
     

    dark_link94

    • 11
    Posts
    16
    Years
    • Seen Feb 13, 2009
    looking for a single, 6v6 battle
    clauses: Sleep Clause, 0HKO clause, Hax item Clause, Species Cause, Self-KO Clause
    PM me about it
     

    Postman

    .
    • 446
    Posts
    16
    Years
    • Age 14
    • Seen Jul 6, 2011
    Volkner's Apprentice said:
    Well they're all certainly allowed, of course. The problem is, nobody ever uses an entire team of OU legends anyway because they don't all offer the support a team needs to win here (usually.) It shouldn't be a problem to toss the ban on at about three OU's per team, that gives people the chance to still use like Suicune, Heatran, and Azelf on the same squad if they wanted to while still keeping it "fair".
    Click to expand...

    I don't see why you can't just let there be no limits on legends.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top