KieronGames
May be more active
- 286
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Seen Nov 24, 2012
Hmm... I really have nothing to say here...
Not only did the Kriegsmarine lack the sheer amount of force needed to seriously challenge the Royal Navy in the first place, it also lacked specialized landing craft and would have had to rely on river barges to transport ground forces and supplies across the English Channel; not only would these barges be limited in their carrying capacity, they would have been highly vulnerable to enemy attack and rough seas. Operation Sealion would have been an unmitigated disaster if it had actually been attempted; if the invasion force wasn't picked off by the Home Fleet, it would have surely drowned without ever coming within sight of the English coast.I take it then that Nazi Germany winning the Battle of the Atlantic is a given.
Operation Sealion would go ahead, the British Isles would be taken within a month or two.
Any straightforward trans-Atlantic amphibious operation would fail miserably, so the US wouldn't enter the European theatre until much later, and possibly not at all, of that I'm fairly certain; unless perhaps Iceland would've been willing to thrust itself into the war as a base for the US, but with the danger of U-boats this'd only have a chance to happen in 1943 at the earliest.
For starters, just as Germany never had a chance of defeating the United Kingdom, it never had a chance of defeating the Soviet Union either. Despite some early successes, Operation Barbarossa was ultimately doomed to failure; Hitler and his general staff were so confident of a quick victory that they did not even entertain the possibility of winter warfare, which became an inevitability as the German offensive stalled. If you actually knew something about World War II or the Napoleonic Wars, you should already be familiar with how fighting in Russia during the winter is an extremely unwise idea; it's extremely cold, and it's immediately preceded by a mud season where just about every unpaved surface becomes near-impossible to traverse with horses or motorized vehicles. Soviet industrial capability at the start of World War II was on par with Germany's and second only to that of the United States, and the Soviets were consistently able to outproduce Germany at every turn. The only reason why the Germans were so successful in the early stages of Barbarossa was because the Soviets were caught with their pants down; they were still in the process of adopting new equipment and tactics in light of Germany's earlier successes in Poland, France, and the Low Countries.If it had been won by Germany, Hitler could focus all attention on Russia - No doubt being able to win.
With the strongest air force and strongest land force on his side, Hitler would attack the American U-Boats, lowering America's morale. No doubt winning this battle, America would have been forced to work with Germany and build the Nuclear bomb. If the Invasion of America was lost, it would of fallen within that decade as Hitler's forces could of built the bomb and launch it over America. No doubt if America lost the first invasion, they would have no resources to fight back at Germany or launch an attack first. America would of eventually persuaded Britain into revolting against Germany -- As they needed the air force and they(America) would supply Naval ships. The last sentence would of occured if America hadn't of been nuked. If they were nuked, no doubt Nuclear War would of broke out - bringing the world to an end.
I conclude my theory that the Battle of Britain had severe consequences if Germany had won.