PiemanFiddy
Dark-Type Gym Leader
- 194
- Posts
- 11
- Years
- Florida
- Seen Oct 1, 2016
I've gotta be the only one in this thread that thinks this is a good idea? ....fine.
Now I know it'd be unbalanced and too 'complex' to learn the new weaknesses of the different types, but that's what we said about dual-typing when that came out.
Everyone was all crazed about that too.
The immunities? I don't really see that changing as long as Gamefreak can test all the different possibilities. Besides, it's not like EVERY pokemon is going to be a tri-type in Gen. 6. (if there are any to begin with)
Personally, I think it's a fantastic idea. It would bring a new challenging factor to the Pokemon franchise, introduce different weaknesses and hence, different solutions to said weaknesses, and it would just overall be a great idea.
It's not bad to say that we need new types for Pokemon come this time. Ever since Gen. 2, there have been ZERO changes to the typing. Some weaknesses have changed, yes, but the typing itself has remained neutral.
I personally believe that it deserves a change.
Now I know it'd be unbalanced and too 'complex' to learn the new weaknesses of the different types, but that's what we said about dual-typing when that came out.
Everyone was all crazed about that too.
The immunities? I don't really see that changing as long as Gamefreak can test all the different possibilities. Besides, it's not like EVERY pokemon is going to be a tri-type in Gen. 6. (if there are any to begin with)
Personally, I think it's a fantastic idea. It would bring a new challenging factor to the Pokemon franchise, introduce different weaknesses and hence, different solutions to said weaknesses, and it would just overall be a great idea.
It's not bad to say that we need new types for Pokemon come this time. Ever since Gen. 2, there have been ZERO changes to the typing. Some weaknesses have changed, yes, but the typing itself has remained neutral.
I personally believe that it deserves a change.