• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Double Type Moves and Triple type Pokemon

Do you think we need double type attacks, and triple type pokemon?(answer to two)

  • Yes, double type attacks would be good

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • No, double attacks would be too complicated(or for some other reason)

    Votes: 8 34.8%
  • Yes, I'd love triple type pokemon

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • NO, it's already complicated enough with two types!(or some other reason)

    Votes: 8 34.8%

  • Total voters
    23

Chibaymega12

Enemies of the Leaf Beware!
  • 1,159
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Do you think that they should start making double type attacks? Like Fire punch, it should be fire and fighting

    Reply to the Poll and the thread
     
    Hmm, fire punch? i guess double type moves might make it double the super effective against grass-flying like Tropius, but really ineffective to water-poison pokemon, like Tentacruel
     
    It would also make it that much more of a challenge, too ;)
     
    yeah, it'd also make it a ton easier to knock out a pokemon, the maximum would go up to 12x
     
    Maybe it would make good use for the moves Endure, detect and/or protect.
     
    was just about to double post taht

    refering to the triple types, that would suck if there were both and you had a complete advantage over them
     
    I dont know how triple types will work? Seems hard for gamefreak mayba
     
    Not to rain on the parade, buit that would make things SOOOOOO complicated. If it aint broken, don't fix it. Right? That would ruin pokemon...
     
    Not to rain on the parade, buit that would make things SOOOOOO complicated. If it aint broken, don't fix it. Right? That would ruin pokemon...
    Agreed. While the double and triple types would be more realistic, it would complicate things too much, in my opinion.
     
    yeah, as soon as i posted the triple i was like, eeeeh, no tahts stupid, but i still think the we should have double move types
     
    im supportive to double type moves, that would make the game more realistic, i just dont see how triple type pokemon would work, it seems imbalance for some reason.
     
    I really don't like the double move thing too. I think the physical/special thing in D/P is as close as Nintendo will go.
     
    Or should go. I agree, Muddy Water? What the hell is that? Make up your mind. Is it Ground, Water, or both? Apparently Water. Whatever. Then Thunderpunch. It would be overpowered. Hitting many types. Or underpowered. Not hitting enough. But never "just right".

    So to me, the physical/special split is as far as they should go.
     
    how about each double type move, has a physical/special type, that might bound to even ways.
     
    maybe.... But if they'd have double type moves, you'd think theyd take out the physical and special attack types, so they can lessen the complications of the games a little
     
    or they could use special/special and phys/phys type moves as well.
     
    Back
    Top