MTG:Broodstar Affinity

[KLS]

Vial Affinity, Ravager Affinity, Broodstar Affinity

alll of these decks that have in common is that all of them have speed.
Ravager, stocking up it's attack power by sacrificing artifacts.
Vial, summoning by putting counters in it.
Broodstar, attack power = to artifacts you have in the field.

Broodstar Affinity
4x Seat Of Synod
4x Vault Of Whisper
2x Glimmervoids
4x Darksteel Citadel
4x Blinkmoth Nexus
4x Broodstar
3x nimshrieker
4x frogmites
4x myr enforcer
4x ornithropter
2x irradiate
4x welding jar
3x chrome mox
3x sensei's divining top
4x thoughtcast
4x crainal plating
3x lightning greaves

side
4x annul
4x Disciple Of The Vault
3x echoing decay
3x terror
1x vedalken archmage

 

[Kenny_C.002]

Seriously with that I still think Raffinity can still do much better than Star Affinity.

 

[KLS]

...
my Star Affinity beat 6 raffinity....
turn 4 they had out a ravager
turn 6 i had a broodstar 12/12 w/ cranial plating so that's 24/24 and i irradicated ravager the next turn

 

[Kenny_C.002]

No, I meant like overall, since star affinity is much more vulnerable than raffinity in terms of anti-artifacts. I could care less about mirrors.

 

[KLS]

that's interesting due to the fact that the whole kill condition of raffinity is ravager itself, whereas broodstar is not an artifact...

 

[Kenny_C.002]

Of course. It's the fact that ravager doesn't even need to care about anti-artifacts pointed at it, whereas Star affinity would fear anti-artifacts pointed at your artifacts. I'm not saying it isn't viable as a deck or anything, but I'm just skeptical at this point in time. I'm sure that if you're all for it, it would be at least tourney-ready if not worthy.