Now this is a pointless thread!

[prateek203]

A pointless thread is this one. But I've to create it, cause smart moderators reply to my post, have a discussion over MY post, and when I log in (i.e. after a few minutes), the thread is locked and so I can't reply there. How great! And then I've to create another new thread to reply to those posts, which I could have done if thread wasn't locked.

Though the discussion was already over when I said "Well nevermind...not a big deal...", but moderators elongated that discussion (which is ok), said something to me, and then closed it so that I can't reply. How weird.

Now I'll start receiving infractions just cause of the fact that though I didn't wanted to, but I "had to" create a new thread cause moderators closed the previous thread without the discussion being actually over (which could have been if it wouldn't have been elongated as I already agreed and finished it.)

 

[parallelzero]

...Private messaging is a system that exists for a reason. You could have just PMed the parties involved as opposed to making a new thread? owo

 

[prateek203]

I knew I should have not removed this line from my post:

"And before anybody asks me to use PM, let me remind that in PM, all the moderators and me cannot discuss about it simultaneously. It will be a different parallel discussion with each of them individually, which won't be any good as discussing simultaneously."

 

[Sydian]

Though the discussion was already over when I said "Well nevermind...not a big deal...", but moderators elongated that discussion (which is ok), said something to me, and then closed it so that I can't reply. How weird.

If you wanted to reply to what I had addressed to you in the previous thread, you could have just PMed me about it. But if you must know, I asked Morkula to close the thread because you implied it was pretty much done anyway and I, once again, felt it was pointless.

Now I'll start receiving infractions just cause of the fact that though I didn't wanted to, but I "had to" create a new thread cause moderators closed the previous thread without the discussion being actually over (which could have been if it wouldn't have been elongated as I already agreed and finished it.)

You'll receive infractions for spamming, but I guess this is more considered that you want some feedback. Technically, you didn't have to make this thread either. I have to reiterate once again, you could have simply PMed me. Now everything's a big fat public mess. I'm a moderator and I was just doing my job, and my job is to keep the pointless threads that evoke no discussion out of my section. And that's what I did.

"And before anybody asks me to use PM, let me remind that in PM, all the moderators and me cannot discuss about it simultaneously. It will be a different parallel discussion with each of them individually, which won't be any good as discussing simultaneously."

If I recall, and I'm certain I'm right, I was the one who closed the thread. There should be no reason to discuss this with any other moderator or staff member other than me, so PMs would have been fine.

 

[parallelzero]

But... when it comes down to it, isn't this just between you and the mod who closed your thread? They enforce the rules there, so I don't see why a hand-holding group discussion is necessary. owo;

And didn't you even say it doesn't matter in your last thread, indicating you were done with it? So why would you have replied again? owo

EDIT: What this person said. ^

 

[prateek203]

Yes but once other moderators did replied so it was not anymore a PM. I had to make other moderators read the reply too, cause they themselves got involved.

And yes the discussion was indeed over, if it wouldn't have been elongated unnecessarily. I really didn't cared about this so much, but mods posted even I said it's ok. They dragged me back into this, I wasn't even gonna look at that thread anymore, if I wouldn't have received that SMS notification on my phone.

And how is this spamming now? How in the world is this spamming?

And, if I would have PMed, then parallelzero and other people & mods, wouldn't be able to view & reply, which I want to (plus, they themselves got into this.)

Anyways, now I'm again saying "I DON'T CARE" and discussion is over and I'm logging off. So is that gonna happen again that next time I log in, I'll see new posts and the thread will be closed immediately after the new post? Well, I don't care about the discussion being elongated, but the thread better be open so I can reply to those new posts.

Well, see ya later...
Adiós! (This is spanish "bye", before I get an infraction for using unknown words).
Bye!!!

 

[Sydian]

Yes but once other moderators did replied so it was not anymore a PM. I had to make other moderators read the reply too, cause they themselves got involved.

They didn't need to be involved. For the 7000th time, you could have just PMed me about the situation instead of making a thread. Just because they replied to it, it doesn't mean it's their problem now. Timbjerr posted there too, so is he involved? No.

And yes the discussion was indeed over, if it wouldn't have been elongated unnecessarily. I really didn't cared about this so much, but mods posted even I said it's ok. They dragged me back into this, I wasn't even gonna look at that thread anymore, if I wouldn't have received that SMS notification on my phone.

That defeats the purpose of the thread then if you're not even going to look back into it. If you expect feed back on a thread, you should check back in. Don't even make one if you just want to point something out and let it sit there. Someone will eventually say something about it.

And how is this spamming now? How in the world is this spamming?

It's not. I said that this qualifies for wanting feedback, so it's not spamming.

Anyways, now I'm again saying "I DON'T CARE" and discussion is over and I'm logging off. So is that gonna happen again that next time I log in, I'll see new posts and the thread will be closed immediately after the new post? Well, I don't care about the discussion being elongated, but the thread better be open so I can reply to those new posts.

Probably. But hey, that's your own fault for making another thread, expecting feedback, and being done with it because you didn't get the answers and actions you wanted.

Well, see ya later...
Adiós! (This is spanish "bye", before I get an infraction for using unknown words).
Bye!!!

Au revoir. Arrivederci. Auf Wiedersehen. さようなら。

 

[prateek203]

For the 7001st time, I wanted to have discussion with other people about the fact that moderators do it. Didn't wanted to have any clarification from YOU why you closed that.

And why would I check back the thread if the discussion was over.

And I never said it's their problem. But they did replied so they should see what the final outcome is.

And yes, the previous discussion was over. But then there were new posts, AFTER THE DISCUSSION BEING OVER. And then the thread was closed, without me letting reply to those new posts. That's why I had to create a new thread.

And most probably I'll have to create another PUBLIC thread cause Markula isn't replying me on PM about the infraction thing, when I see he/she's online. But maybe sometime later, cause I've to study for the exam. And this is just a forum...just a forum, nothing big. But I surely will. So he better reply. Otherwise there will be another discussion why I created new thread.

 

[Sydian]

For the 7001st time, I wanted to have discussion with other people about the fact that moderators do it. Didn't wanted to have any clarification from YOU why you closed that.

Since I'm the one that closed it, why wouldn't I clarify? Seemed like you didn't understand in the first thread.

And yes, the previous discussion was over. But then there were new posts, AFTER THE DISCUSSION BEING OVER. And then the thread was closed, without me letting reply to those new posts. That's why I had to create a new thread.

What else did you need to say? It was only me and Luke that replied before you could say anything to us. Did you really need to reply to Luke mocking you? It would have made no difference.

And most probably I'll have to create another PUBLIC thread cause Markula isn't replying me on PM about the infraction thing, when I see he/she's online. But maybe sometime later, cause I've to study for the exam. But I will. So he better reply. Otherwise there will be another discussion why I created new thread.

Morkula has a life and plenty of other things to handle, so he'll get to your PM when he can. Besides, this has gone so off topic now that I don't even remember why you made the first thread anyway. Now it just seems that it's the case of who is involved with this and the fact your thread got closed before you could respond.

 

[parallelzero]

Alright, this is just stupid now. x.x
Your original thread was closed. Deal with it.
Your feedback thread was closed. Deal with it.

If a thread needs to be closed, it will be closed regardless of whether or not there's an ongoing "discussion". If this is STILL a problem for you. Please, PM me. I'll be sure to reply to you the second I wake up tomorrow. However, in the meantime, leave it be. I can't even see your point anymore. x.x