New topic: 'Which Cute Pokemon from the list should be removed? Give reasons!'
Some Pokemon will end up being removed, so choose carefully and pick your reasons well! ;D
It's honestly a bit hard of a choice, as I think all of the Pokémon on the list are cute. ...Or mostly all. I don't agree with those saying that Larvesta should be removed from the list, as even though it doesn't have a cute expression, which I often base my opinions on the cuteness of Pokémon on, I think that its cute, fluffy body kinda makes up for it. As well as with those who think Dragonite should be removed. It may not be small and adorable like most of the Pokémon on the list, but there are a lot of things that determine whether a Pokémon is cute or not. I too questioned whether it should've been added to the list when I first saw it was there, but then I took a glance at its facial expression, which made me realise why it was on the list, and if you look closely enough, you can see what looks like a smile.
Now, a Pokémon that I think should be removed from the list, is Gastly. I don't know who added it, but I don't think it was the best choice tbh. I don't know what people find cute about it, since everything I see is a small, ball-shaped ghost, with a rather angry or mischievious looking facial expression. Not exactly what I would picture upon hearing the word 'cute'.
Another thing, which I most certainly don't want removed from the list, but which seems rather weird in my opinion, is the Kangaskhan baby. It is without doubt cute, though it is not an actual Pokémon and therefore it doesn't really seem to fit on the list. I am well aware of the theories from the first game of it fitting in with the Cubone line, yet I still don't really think it fits in on the list. Maybe this is something worth discussing?
I also find it weird that the sprite that is used for Cherrim is the one that doesn't show a bit of the cuteness that Cherrim possess, so another thing that I want changed in the list.
