5th Gen 3 on 3 BATTLES!!!!

[T33nyTurtwig]

I think it'll be REAL EPIC, since there wont be a lack of space for it as they are fully animated and moving around. The one thing i wanna know is if we get to battle the champ, the tower tycoon and the rival on 3v3. If there is one improvement i suggest, its to make the fully animated pokemon MOVE fully, like when you use something like scratch, instead of moving forward, you could get the arm and and have the pokemon doing a scratch motion. And while that happens, a good special effects thing like for a flamethrower, and a moving camera.

 

[BlooDy_MuloS!!]

i dont know guys but these games will be great!!!!!!!!!!1

 

[King Gumball]

3 on 3 battles is epic win. Something I have been waiting for since two on two battles. I knew it would come some day!

 

[Meadow]

3 on 3 is nice, though it's not too big of an upgrade. 6 on 6 (party vs party) is something to look foward to. Although it needs better physics for 6 on 6. Anyways, I was waiting for 3 on 3 all this time.

 

[Matt-O]

I think it's a great idea. I never got into double battles competitively, but I might just make a triple battle team.

 

[austy14]

This'll be more epic in the battle frontier! It's like a normal sized BF team all out at once!

 

[Volroc]

If anything I hate triple battles even more. That sequence screen is a convoluted mess. No thanks

this is gonna be the same person who posts the

"I ****ING LOVE TRIPLE BATTLES" thread once theyve played them :P

 

[OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire]

this is gonna be the same person who posts the

"I ****ING LOVE TRIPLE BATTLES" thread once theyve played them :P

NO I am as I have loved them since day 1 :P!

 

[Ho-Oh]

Watch the "*"'s.

I think everyone either hates or loves the idea of triple battles really. Well... except me, who didn't really care about how many Pokemon in a battle in the first place. Though it'll bring something new to Pokemon - so that's good.

 

[Kylie-chan]

Well, it was bound to be controversial. 3v3 looks interesting, though not sure how balanced it will be. Probably very offensively skewed. Rotational battles make me feel like we're playing Fire Emblem. xD; I don't mind, I'm interested to see if the VGC will shift from 2v2 in 2012 (since the games only come out in March in the US, 2v2 next year seems fairly likely).

 

[Logiedan]

I kind of like the rotational battles, it's kind of like a way to switch out without getting damaged. It's still mainly 1-on-1 so there's going to be a new twist now. What I want to see is how are the competitive players going to cope with this(if they use this battling mode/style). I'd really like to see strategies used for the rotation battles.

 

[BartCiao]

Why not more double battles instead of triple battles? Maybe a double gym leader, or a double elite four? That'd be freaking awesome! I've always been a fan of double battles? Triple battles... that's really too much. What's next: a battle 6 vs 6? BTW: that'd be kinda cool:D

 

[lbirrueta]

EARTHQUAKE is going to be a ***** move!!!

 

[Zaroas]

Hm, triple battles... Interesting idea. I was waiting to see if this would happen once I had my first Double Battle in Ruby, and apparently it did. I wonder if they'll make Triplet trainers (Like the Twins trainers, except with a third person.)

 

[AmatuerHacker]

It will be alright. But i dont want it to be a major part in the story. Perhaps a battle fronteir thing or something

Exactly the same thought i can't wait to see how they are going insert these. A battle frontier brain in a 3 on 3 would be awesome. Online 3 on 3... i think that would be utter rubbish tbh like half your team gone unless they increase max team size to something like 8 maybe.

 

[yaya0]

This is the worst thing to ever happen to Pokémon.

 

[Honest]

I like it a lot. Serves as a better challenge, imo, then double battles do to who and how you can attack.