I groaned out loud when this topic came up, I really did. ^.^;; Probably because I've spent a
lot of time debating the issue with one of those strict canon-nazis Jax mentioned (with absolutely no disrespect intended, because said canon-nazi is one of the most insightful people I've talked to), with the upshot that I am heartily sick and tired of the subject.
...that said, you wouldn't
believe how much my perception's changed from what it was.
I know I'm more aware of the different canons now than I ever was, whereas before I went with the 'under one umbrella therefore fair game' route. The idea of sticking to the basic laws of canon, such as with the Exploding Charizard thing, have always been a given for me, but part of the reason I like the Pokemon fandom so much is, as everyone else has said, because it's so flexible. Back then, however, it had simply never occurred to me to write stories fixed in one set of canon laws or another, which is obviously a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
So I don't have a problem even with broad interpretations (although obviously I have my own interpretations too, which I'm biased towards :P ). And despite all the debating, I still don't have a problem with cocktailing; just that now I'm more aware of what each canon offers, how the canons contradict, and how cocktailing might or might not work--and as a result, my own interpretation has changed dramatically. Plus, if the contradictions are small enough, I wouldn't have a problem with suspending disbelief, depending on the story, the author, and how it's handled.
In the end I'd probably judge on a story-by-story basis, as opposed to saying that a story's bad, period, because they used
that thing from
that canon in
this canon (without actually seeing whether or not the plotpoint/character/whatever works for the purposes of the story). Which, really, is the kinda same as saying that all OT fics are bad 'cos they're OT (because they're 'cliche', 'overdone', etc).
All that said, I think it's the author's intention and the spirit of what they're trying to portray that's the most important. True, canon is there to guide you and should be adhered to (or else what's the point in writing in the fandom at all?) but I'm not about to shoot someone down for taking creative license if it works, because even if the rules of canon have been stretched, you can usually tell when a writer really cares about the characters and the fandom.
Also, thanks for the responses so far about canon cocktailing. It's actually a reassurance because I was hoping I didn't sound like a hypocrite a couple posts back (considering I tend to do it because I often write about side characters in universes that left them with too little screentime for anything other than what can be done in half an episode). XD
I hear yah. Gawd, do I ever hear yah. In fact I got to the point where I was so concerned about how my stories manipulate canon (and wondering whether that made me a bad fan or not) that I couldn't write at
all.
...and that makes me sound unbelievably sad. ^.^;;; Fortunately I'm pretty much over that now, but I still hadn't been planning on getting in on the topic until I saw everyone's replies.