Actually, legendaries are one of the main reasons I'm still with Pokemon. :D Constantly, I'm envisioning epic battles with them. But I agree, Sinnoh's count was a bit excessive:
Dialga,
Palkia, and
Giratina were OK because they're the version mascots
Mesprit,
Azelf, and UX
LE (Uxie sounds crappy) looked like cheap Lati@s ripoffs when I first saw them, but they've grown into their own niche. As the trio, they were necessary too.
I'm glad
Regigigas was introduced because I felt the Regis didn't have a proper master among the Weather Trio. And this was the only where it could be introduced properly, as it references events/Pokemon from the immediately preceding Gen. If it were added in Gen V or later, that would look simply too out of place.
Heatran is awesome (as well as its backstory) but I feel it could've been saved for a future generation. It doesn't really fit as a version mascot IMO because it's a bit too reminiscent of Groudon from Pokemon Ruby Version. That, and I don't really see what could counterpart it...
Introducing
Shaymin and Manaphy in the same generation is just...unnecessary.
One 'cute' legend per gen... Seeing as Shaymin got more recognition with the release of Platinum, I'd say Manaphy should've waited for another Gen (its title 'Prince of the Seas' irks me, because we already have 2 Legendaries that have
major associations with the seas as well as being version mascots:
Lugia and
Kyogre).
Phione was just an unnecessary waste of PokeDex space.
Lucario, despite not being an official legendary, IMO serves as DPPt's 'humanoid' legendary, similar to
Mewtwo and
Deoxys in the past.
Zoroark technically fits this for Black and White as well (I know, not an official legendary since he evolves from Zorua)
Darkrai IMO could've been introduced by himself, but
Cresselia is not a bad counterpart. They resemble RSE's Lati@s for me.
For me,
Arceus's introduction, design, and backstory are awesome. Perhaps it would have been fitting to introduce it as the last Pokemon
ever, but it's fine where it is. It's actually more proper since time, space, and antimatter (what the reality/dragon trio members embody) can be seen, in some aspects, as the foundations that constitute reality. Arceus as a version mascot wouldn't fit, though, due to its sheer importance...unless it were counterparted by a Pokemon representing pure destruction as opposed to creation (assumed by some at first to be Giratina, but not really since Giratina is subject to Arceus and can't really counterpart it).
So, aside from Heatran and Manaphy (and Arceus sort of), I believe Gen IV's legends were justified for the most part. I'll let the overinclusion of legends slide for
this Gen IV, but that's it. There
should be a limit on how many are introduced per Gen, or 'legendary' status just becomes a term that's not special anymore...
Black and White, IMO, should have:
3 Legendary Version Mascots
A New Trio (please, something other than red, blue, and yellow all the time! What about green, purple, orange?
)
One Cute Legendary
Humanoid Legendary (Zoroark already satisfies this condition for me)
Possibly a Lati@s-esque Duo or a standalone (could expand exploration time in game)
The count comes out to
8 Legendaries per Gen for me.
9-11 could be warranted if the duo/standalone has an actual purpose for being added such as a new backstory, moves, abilities, more usage in battles; and/or if it complements the other legendaries...
EDIT: And please, can we axe event legendaries? Not everyone has Wi-Fi or the time/ability to get to an event...
Actually, legendaries are one of the main reasons I'm still with Pokemon. :D Constantly, I'm envisioning epic battles with them. But I agree, Sinnoh's count was a bit excessive:
Dialga,
Palkia, and
Giratina were OK because they're the version mascots
Mesprit,
Azelf, and UX
LE (Uxie sounds crappy) looked like cheap
Lati@s ripoffs when I first saw them, but they've grown into their own niche. As the trio, they were necessary too.
I'm glad
Regigigas was introduced because I felt the Regis didn't have a proper master among the Weather Trio. And this was the only where it could be introduced properly, as it references events/Pokemon from the immediately preceding Gen. If it were added in Gen V or later, that would look simply too out of place.
Heatran is awesome (as well as its backstory) but I feel it could've been saved for a future generation. It doesn't really fit as a version mascot IMO because it's a bit too reminiscent of Groudon from Pokemon Ruby Version. That, and I don't really see what could counterpart it...
Introducing
Shaymin and Manaphy in the same generation is just...unnecessary.
One 'cute' legend per gen... Seeing as Shaymin got more recognition with the release of Platinum, I'd say Manaphy should've waited for another Gen (its title 'Prince of the Seas' irks me, because we already have 2 Legendaries that have
major associations with the seas as well as being version mascots:
Lugia and
Kyogre).
Phione was just an unnecessary waste of PokeDex space.
Lucario, despite not being an official legendary, IMO serves as DPPt's 'humanoid' legendary, similar to
Mewtwo and
Deoxys in the past.
Zoroark technically fits this for Black and White as well (I know, not an official legendary since he evolves from Zorua)
Darkrai IMO could've been introduced by himself, but
Cresselia is not a bad counterpart. They resemble RSE's
Lati@s for me.
For me,
Arceus's introduction, design, and backstory are awesome. Perhaps it would have been fitting to introduce it as the last Pokemon
ever, but it's fine where it is. It's actually more proper since time, space, and antimatter (what the reality/dragon trio members embody) can be seen, in some aspects, as the foundations that constitute reality. Arceus as a version mascot wouldn't fit, though, due to its sheer importance...unless it were counterparted by a Pokemon representing pure destruction as opposed to creation (assumed by some at first to be Giratina, but not really since Giratina is subject to Arceus and can't really counterpart it).
So, aside from Heatran and Manaphy (and Arceus sort of), I believe Gen IV's legends were justified for the most part. I'll let the overinclusion of legends slide for
this Gen IV, but that's it. There
should be a limit on how many are introduced per Gen, or 'legendary' status just becomes a term that's not special anymore...
Black and White should have:
3 Legendary Version Mascots
A New Trio (please, something other than red, blue, and yellow all the time! What about green, purple, orange?
)
One Cute Legendary
Humanoid Legendary (Zoroark already satisfies this condition for me)
Possibly a Lati@s-esque Duo or a standalone (could expand exploration time in game)
The count comes out to 8 Legendaries per Gen for me.
9-11 could be warranted if the duo/standalone has an actual purpose for being added such as a new backstory, moves, abilities, more usage in battles; and/or if it complements the other legendaries...