This entire sentence is already demeaning. And prejudiced, I daresay.
I think you've missed the point of infractions entirely. They serve as an official warning for any offenses you've had on the forums. To date, we continue to hold to your current infractions. Making out like we're ill equipping our moderators by providing them the ability to infract as they like is an extreme statement.
It's not in my interests to silence your opinion, but matters involving infractions and decisions relating to infractions remain with the staff members involved.
Again, you're attacking members of staff. But I'll entertain you for a moment.
Staff are around to maintain upkeep. The staff are not always right. But they try everything to be just. If you're causing undue disturbances, you will be punished by an infraction. If it seems to be unjustified, the onus is on you to approach the staff member who infracted you, or bring the matter higher up.
Of course, it's my responsibility as an admin to resolve such matters. I use my discretion to determine whether an infraction stands or not. I also receive reports of how you've responded to the staff member in question. If you can't do it civilly, then the matter won't be dealt with promptly.
The quote in question suggested nothing. I don't see the value in allowing the members to talk about it.