which pokemon has worst designs gen 1 or gen 5?

which gen has the worst designs?


  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
People will complain about ice cream cone pokemon and chandelier pokemon, meanwhile gen 1 has literally a rock, a body builder, a bee, and many more things that are just something that exists but ""zany"". I will happily take gen 5 designs
 
I think gen 5 is fine. They do have a lot of very interesting Pokemon designs, especially the legendary dragons. Obviously, after multiple generations of adjusting the formula they came up with a way to design that is a lot more consistent and thus allows for new Pokemon to be created in a more streamlined fashion. Thinking back to gen 1: all they had back then was actual monsters and objects to base the designs on. And that resulted in gen 1 Pokemon looking a lot more like actual monsters/objects/animals.
When people think of Gen I being simple they remember the Voltorbs and Magnemites, but there are a lot of towering accessories like plants or leaves or cannons or pokey-bits and slashes, and there are some weird muscly Pokemon that end up actually making them more technically challenging to draw.
That sure did not stop us from drawing them anyway! :D
 
Gen 5 imo has the worse designs. Gen 5 felt weird. and yes there are good gen 5 pokemon. that is not being contested. but i feel like gen 1 has stood the test of time, and even if part of that reason is the fact it was first, they're all iconic. so iconic, that gen 5 literally tries to mirror some of them ( Woobat -> Zubat, Geodude -> Gigalith line, rattata -> patrat, amongst many others) gen 5 had a bunch of awesome pokemon, but it by and far, had the worst of the bunch as well to me.

no, i do like the idea of garbodor and vanilluxe, i think they're good actually, we are pocket monsters afterall, but the elemental monkeys are just kind of uninspired as well as marking the first generation where i was either indifferent or didn't like any of the starters at all. obviously, even that grew on me over time, but i do think it's telling how much of the community disliked them during their time as opposed to XY, which i think while not having nearly as many pokemon, definitely had alot higher quality pokemon.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top