Nolafus
Aspiring something
- 5,724
- Posts
- 11
- Years
- Lost in thought... again
- Seen Mar 4, 2018
Okay, now I know tasers can, thanks for correcting me.Rezilia said:Tasers (that's how it's spelled btw) CAN reel back in.
So you're against these kinds of projectiles? But you said:Rezilia said:The person above was saying that electric weapons like tasers should act like guns with bullets - thus, the projectile leaves the taser so that the range of fire is increased. By doing that, however, the user can no longer reel the electric part of the taser back in, which means they just lost their "ammo". If they need to change their target, they can't hit the new target. The projectile fired would have to be so large that it would take up enough of the taser to not be instantaneously reloadable.
The reason I'm giving you such a hard time is because you keep changing what you're standing for constantly. It seems that in one post you have one view, then by the next post it's a complete turnaround. All I'm asking for is a little consistency.Rezilia said:And if you think tasers can't be turned into more ranged weapons, you're wrong. What do you think projectile knives are for? It is easy to eject the electric part of tasers, having it set to go off at a certain time and only use only a certain amount of electricity at that time.
I'm not seeing where 007_eleven's posts are being inaccurate about our society. If you're going to say that a person's responses are a certain way, quote them. Use the quote tags. I know you can use them, but I don't understand why you don't.
Quote these instances. I'm not seeing them. I'm just trying to understand your point of view, but you're providing little to no evidence on your arguments. I think this is why people argue with you so much. You don't quote people and deal with their various arguments directly, you just lump their post into one big blob and try to cover it with a couple of sentences. That's one of the issues I'm having.Rezilia said:and if [007_eleven] lived here, he'd see why those points don't work. And yet, time and time again, he's been stating things he think will work 100% just because it worked in his nation.
I think the problem of range still applies. Tasers have a very limited range, and will continue to have that limitation as long as the wires are connected to the projectiles. Now, the confusing part for me is that depending on which post of yours that I go off of, you could be for unattached projectiles, or against. That's the main problem I'm having.Rezilia said:My point was not that tasers aren't lethal: it's that they aren't designed to be lethal, whereas guns ARE. Thus, tasers, for the most part, shouldn't kill anyone unless they glitch - that is to say, as long as you use the most recent editions. If you miss your target with a gun and hit a bystander, they're dead. Period. Some people DO have enough willpower to stay alive for more than one bullet, but most people don't. If you use a taser and miss, chances are that the bystander won't die - especially since modern day tasers' electricity can be stopped instantaneously by the user.