Somewhere_
i don't know where
- 4,494
- Posts
- 8
- Years
- somewhere (duh)
- Seen Jun 5, 2019
We all complain about the cost of DLC and the lack of content in the main game. But are games really that expensive?
Game prices seem to have been stuck at $60 since the late 90's/early 2000's. Inflation tends to double prices every 20 years or so, so games should cost approximately $120 nowadays. The prices of games have halved, and this is not entirely due to the introduction of CD's over cartridges (which were very expensive to produce, so higher price) because CD's were used around that same time.
The high cost of advertising and developing games combined with declining prices for video games may be forcing developers to release the optional DLC's that everyone complains about.
As consumers and fans of video games, should we really be complaining about the prices of video games? Should we instead focus our efforts on insuring that AAA companies and other companies listen to their fans on what they want in a game? Or is the current pricing still unreasonable?
if i got anything incorrect here please correct me :)
Game prices seem to have been stuck at $60 since the late 90's/early 2000's. Inflation tends to double prices every 20 years or so, so games should cost approximately $120 nowadays. The prices of games have halved, and this is not entirely due to the introduction of CD's over cartridges (which were very expensive to produce, so higher price) because CD's were used around that same time.
The high cost of advertising and developing games combined with declining prices for video games may be forcing developers to release the optional DLC's that everyone complains about.
As consumers and fans of video games, should we really be complaining about the prices of video games? Should we instead focus our efforts on insuring that AAA companies and other companies listen to their fans on what they want in a game? Or is the current pricing still unreasonable?
if i got anything incorrect here please correct me :)