Mr.Silver
Say Hello To Nurse Barbra
- 670
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Age 30
- The Ushimi region.
- Seen May 26, 2013
What??? Your reply maes no sense dude.
I mean i spend about 7-8 days on each one
What??? Your reply maes no sense dude.
I mean i spend about 7-8 days on each one
That makes even less sense. How has that got any to do with what sets you would make for less used Pokemon???
Just lost a battle to one of my real life friends. (Impviii)
Lil' Bro was bugging me the whole time so he didn't exactly face my best, but a wins a win...
He'll definitely be a respectable battler should he continue to challenge.
i know how u feel skythur my lil' sis is always annoying me soo much
I spend 7-8 days on A pokemon.I just go by dex order.And "less used" pokemon would differ from person to person.(E.g: I might say regirock is a less used pokemon yet aero might say hitmonlee is a less used pokemon).Understand now?
No they are not, what is used less is a fact based on what is actually used less. We all know that. And you still are avoiding my question??? Take a Lumineon for example, a Pokemon nobody ever uses. What set would you make for it??? How much time is irrelevant (in fact it should take a week to train a Pokemon), what matters is the quality of the set. And you could make a really bad set thinking it is good for all we know, and a better player might lose because of having these crappy sets. So how are you going to cater for that??? To be honest, it would be more fair and along the same lines if you just did a roulette using that RNG. Generate the dex numbers to determine yer teams and then the opponent goes off and trains their team. It's the exact same as your method except their is no trust or knowledge issues, and skill will be more at play.
Anyway, since it is optional I rest my case. I'll likely just finish at the elites.
Oh that's real mature big bro... You're a terrible battler, deal with it.
Little siblings are awesome. :t108:
everybody that is still here yes