• Just a reminder that providing specifics on, sharing links to, or naming websites where ROMs can be accessed is against the rules. If your post has any of this information it will be removed.
  • Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Trading Card Game 2 protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

[Script] Can't find merge conflict?

  • 17
    Posts
    3
    Years
    • Seen Dec 14, 2022
    I'm in the process of applying DizzyEgg's modifications to pokeemerald, except I'm running into a serious problem when I try to manually merge the three repositories. So when I pull item_expansion (after pulling battle_engine), I get some merge conflicts, as expected:
    Spoiler:

    However, when I go to modify the problem code, for example in wild_encounter.c, I can't find the "<<<<<<HEAD" string anywhere in the file:
    Spoiler:

    I'm completely stumped on how to fix this, every tutorial on merge conflicts assumes that this string insertion happens but for whatever reason it hasn't for me
     
    Last edited:
    I'm in the process of applying DizzyEgg's modifications to pokeemerald, except I'm running into a serious problem when I try to manually merge the three repositories. So when I pull item_expansion (after pulling battle_engine), I get some merge conflicts, as expected:

    However, when I go to modify the problem code, for example in wild_encounter.c, I can't find the "<<<<<<HEAD" string anywhere in the file:

    I'm completely stumped on how to fix this, every tutorial on merge conflicts assumes that this string insertion happens but for whatever reason it hasn't for me
    You already brought this up in my tutorial about merging Egg's branches and I already replied.
     
    Back
    Top