Scarlet Weather
The Game is Afoot!
- 1,823
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- In a House
- Seen Mar 20, 2016
Maddy... um...
Don't go making claims about the Bible that you can't prove. I, for one, think you and your friend are the ones being conned here. But that's another story.
Actually, I know of at least one Pokemon fan who thinks that Jinx was quite possibly based on "blackface", a style of performance in which white actors or singers would smear their faces and hands with black shoe polish. It was pretty racist. There's no actual proof that Jinx is based on Ganguro by the way, and many of the other theories surrounding it have little or no credibility. It also doesn't entirely explain why Nintendo changed Jinx's skin instead of simply stating it was based off of Ganguro fashions. That doesn't mean the series itself is racist, it simply means that it had a racist caricature and it got rid of it. That should actually say a lot about how the series is positive. I seriously doubt that if Nintendo had intended to be racist with Pokemon that they still would have changed Jinx's skin.
Moving on, I don't have a problem with Pokemon and Arceus because Arceus isn't a real being. But enough of that. There isn't anything inherently wrong with playing Pokemon according to the Bible. (I'm serious here, there are quite a few verses in the Pauline epistles that outline Christian liberty. While the issue that he wrote to deal with was Christians eating food that had been sacrificed to idols after God made foods that had previously been ceremonially unclean A-OK, it can be applied to any controversy. The basic message? "You can do what you want, as long as it doesn't violate God's law or drive a wedge between you and your [spiritual] brother.")
Moving on from that, I'd like to point out that a lot of this controversy has blown over. People aren't complaining about it as much as they used to since Pokemon is no longer popular. Guess they won't rant unless they're getting their fifteen minutes of fame from it, eh?
Don't go making claims about the Bible that you can't prove. I, for one, think you and your friend are the ones being conned here. But that's another story.
Actually, I know of at least one Pokemon fan who thinks that Jinx was quite possibly based on "blackface", a style of performance in which white actors or singers would smear their faces and hands with black shoe polish. It was pretty racist. There's no actual proof that Jinx is based on Ganguro by the way, and many of the other theories surrounding it have little or no credibility. It also doesn't entirely explain why Nintendo changed Jinx's skin instead of simply stating it was based off of Ganguro fashions. That doesn't mean the series itself is racist, it simply means that it had a racist caricature and it got rid of it. That should actually say a lot about how the series is positive. I seriously doubt that if Nintendo had intended to be racist with Pokemon that they still would have changed Jinx's skin.
Moving on, I don't have a problem with Pokemon and Arceus because Arceus isn't a real being. But enough of that. There isn't anything inherently wrong with playing Pokemon according to the Bible. (I'm serious here, there are quite a few verses in the Pauline epistles that outline Christian liberty. While the issue that he wrote to deal with was Christians eating food that had been sacrificed to idols after God made foods that had previously been ceremonially unclean A-OK, it can be applied to any controversy. The basic message? "You can do what you want, as long as it doesn't violate God's law or drive a wedge between you and your [spiritual] brother.")
Moving on from that, I'd like to point out that a lot of this controversy has blown over. People aren't complaining about it as much as they used to since Pokemon is no longer popular. Guess they won't rant unless they're getting their fifteen minutes of fame from it, eh?