• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • It's time to vote for your favorite Pokémon Battle Revolution protagonist in our new weekly protagonist poll! Click here to cast your vote and let us know which PBR protagonist you like most.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Dialga ex :: Dialga ex PEOPLE!

Flame Claw

Flaminator
  • 579
    Posts
    20
    Years
    It's been a while since I faked a regular Pokémon ex, I saw Cascade's Dialga art, so I asked Cascade to use the art, and got permission.

    Dialga

    The idea of the card is to use Movements In Time when you have more than 2 Energy to power up Majestic Spears by discarding energy.

    Tell me whacha think =)
     
    that looks EXACTLY like my card ;)! really sweeeeett :P! your an awesome faker coz your placing is PERFECT! and my art :P! where can you go wrong?
     
    It say's 30 + 10 damage, but on the card 20 + is written
     
    And why you'd have to wait two more turns following Movements in Time to take advantage of Majestic Spears, I don't know. But meh, it's your card. I love the artwork, but you do realise that that layout won't be in use?
     
    Very nice. Just my improvements on the rulings/text are:

    Movements In Time should read: .. You may attach any amount of Energy Cards from your hand or discard any amount of Energy cards attached to Dialga ex, until 2 energy cards remain.

    There is a big difference between attaching Energy and Energy Cards. Also you spelt Hand wrong. :D

    Same with Majestic Spears. It says each 'Energy' in your discard pile, despite Energy cannot be in a discard pile (only attached to in play Pokemon) also some energy have varying amounts. This attack should definately read 'Energy Cards in your discard pile'
    Majestic Spears also says 20+, but also states 30+, IMO it's a broken attack so it should stay at 20+ or lower the max amount of damage (approx 60 is more realistic).

    Nice card ;)
     
    Wow. All the mistakes have been pointed out.

    9/10 At least your choice of art is better this time ;)
     
    Back
    Top