Dragon's Den V.3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would you like to see a fully evolved, PURE Dragon type in the future?

Yes.
 
Would you like to see a fully evolved, PURE Dragon type in the future?

I guess, not badly, but it wouldn't hurt. Right now i'm waiting on a fire/dragon or ice/dragon :D or dark/dragon; that would be awesome, and a steel armored dragon wud be pretty cool
 
Would you like to see a fully evolved, PURE Dragon type in the future?

- Actually yes, then they might have less weaknesses such as against rock types, and then they would only have a 2x weakness against Ice.
 
And Dragon..no?

A pure dragon couldn't have wings though..Or it would be part flying..It would have to be.
 
I'm gonna say yes and no. Because then it would be highly subjected to ice but it wouldn't be subjected to much else.

Oh, and I didn't even mean to cause any conflict with what I said...
 
A full Dragon? That would be weird. Even in mythology, the dragons are associated with different elements which fits this kids game perfectly.
 
-[JD]- said:
A full Dragon? That would be weird. Even in mythology, the dragons are associated with different elements which fits this kids game perfectly.
Click to expand...
It's too bad that there's already pure Dragon Pokémons such as Dratini and Dragonair. ;D It wouldn't hurt, though. Besides, there are much more weird combination in this game than a pure Dragon type.
 
I totally forgot the Dratini and Dragonair were pure Dragons (LOL) :D Thanks for mentioning that BHwolfgang!

- f l a s h -
 
It is nice to be back and on here again, and before anyone askes where I went, I was in France on the border of St Omer in the Chateau d'ebblinghem. I spent a whole week there, going to different places on different days. Thursday was Disnyland day, but I would have a mild concussion by hitting my head on the ceilling and falling off the top bunk bed. Instead I stayed at the house and really, found that it equalled in greatness to Disneyland, so yeah. I had an overall good time.

Back here;
Would you like to see a fully evolved, PURE Dragon type in the future?
I would like to see one, not have one. They would be weak against ice types majorly, so not really for me. What else did I miss? I hope nothing too good. Anyway, good to be back.
 
Lots of things to say...

1. Bagon and Shelgon don't count as full dragons then?
2. Why the hell does everyone keep saying that they'd be really weak to ice types??? If anything they're less weak than other dragons ffs...

PURE DRAGON = 2x weak
Salamence = 4x
Garchomp = 4x
Dragonite = 4x

God..Why did you think it'd be more weak than the other ones?

3. Welcome back Saphy.
 
My head still isn't quite right. Good point. I'd still maybe not get one, dunno really. What are you listening to? Just wondering because I am listening to Voulez Vous by Erasure. Soon to be Oh l'Amour.
 
Korova. said:
Lots of things to say...

1. Bagon and Shelgon don't count as full dragons then?
2. Why the hell does everyone keep saying that they'd be really weak to ice types??? If anything they're less weak than other dragons ffs...

PURE DRAGON = 2x weak
Salamence = 4x
Garchomp = 4x
Dragonite = 4x

God..Why did you think it'd be more weak than the other ones?

3. Welcome back Saphy.
Click to expand...

Oh yes, cannot forget Bagon and Shelgon...sorry :)
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing...being a pure Dragon they are less weak to Ice, because they won't be dual types.

By the way, do you think they made Dragons weak to Ice Types because it was said that Dinosaurs froze in Prehistoric times? I was wondering about that...
 
They just made them weak to ice...just because..

Otherwise Dragon would be too strong..And also Ice would be too weak.

Simple.
 
Meh, that's a point. Dragons, are the strongest out of all types aren't they?
 
Technically..

As they have 2 weaknessess..4 very common resistances..Only 1 "Super Effective"..But only 1 "Not Very Effective" ..

and basically every dragon has good stats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top