Look, its because we're talking about different things. We're talking about imminent global warming from the sun or raised CO2 whatever you want to believe. You're talking about the sun expanding in billions of years. They're not related OK, so don't talk about them here.
Now let's stop this stupid argument.
Something I think is an important point to discuss is the amount of money flowing into "stopping" global warming, for example the Kyoto protocol.
Did you know, that even by the alarmists reckoning of the effect of CO2 on climate it takes over $100,000,000,000, to prevent 1 millikelvin of warming. That's ridiculous. In the US alone more than $150,000,000,000 is wasted on this futile effort. If course, many scientists don't think CO2 has anywhere near the effect the alarmists say, so really, this value could be way higher. There have however been calls for the implementation andeven more money: up to $400,000,000,000, that is, 1% of the country's GDP. Unbelievable.
So those of you who are saying the government should spend more taxpayers money on climate change, think again because the reality is, that's just what the governments want: calls for more money to flood into this area, so they can give the money to climate scientists and say do your work. Nothing for them to do, and the votes come rolling in.
Meanwhile, we have millons of people living off pence per day, animals dying out from hunting and habitat loss (e.g. the yangtze river dolphin) and god knows what else.
So call for less not more money for global warming, and more for other more worthwhile causes.