- 2,898
- Posts
- 21
- Years
- Seen Jul 27, 2024
I just think sometimes people think forum signatures need to tell their life story of something... but maybe im wrong, lol
No no, people just majorly misunderstand the concept of a signature, and since everybody has large sigs, it's a bit hard to just slam down strict (yet reasonable) rules. o.O;bgtfamily said:I just think sometimes people think forum signatures need to tell their life story of something... but maybe im wrong, lol
Yeah right... in this case it would be better removing the whole signature dude!? >.>;Kipkip said:I say no images in signatures if people abuse the right.
The limit is 150000 pixels for all images added together... which is WAY too much. =\NiNGi said:Yeah right... in this case it would be better removing the whole signature dude!? >.>;
It's funny though how some people put several small images together which when put together become bigger than 500x300 (or whatever the limit is), and no one actually tells them anything because their brainless head thinks that they're not technically breaking the rules... pathetic.
Well it was around. Steve even made a forum wide Announcement telling the members to stop with the code tags. Since it might have been within the limit, but you could have 20 large banners and it would still have to load them (That's the reason why Steve wanted everyone to stop with the code tags in sigs).Digital Phoenix said:I... don't seem to recall that. o.O;
Ah, makes sense. o_o; And did they stop?Arcanine said:Well it was around. Steve even made a forum wide Announcement telling the members to stop with the code tags. Since it might have been within the limit, but you could have 20 large banners and it would still have to load them (That's the reason why Steve wanted everyone to stop with the code tags in sigs).
Do you see code tags in everyone's sigs now? XDDigital Phoenix said:Ah, makes sense. o_o; And did they stop?