LawLessChaoz
LawLessChaotic
- 174
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Seen Aug 19, 2016
Legendary pokemon just have legends behind them.
In my opinion, legendary pokemon are simply pokemon with legends behind them. They don't have to be rare or strong.
Yes, but remember that some "normal" pokemos also have legends in the games, in the anime and even in the cards!In my opinion, legendary pokemon are simply pokemon with legends behind them. They don't have to be rare or strong.
No one disagreed. Everyone one knows that 'legendaries' in games are pokemon that can be caught once.
What I'm trying to say is to look at it from the point of a game character, without the "it can only be caught once per game" attitude. Pretend that the pokemon world = the world you live in. What would you consider a legendary?
Please, no one else post the 'only once a game' thing.
So what if they were based on the games? You can't disregard the anime and manga. Pokemon is not just the games anymore. I don't care if you don't like anything else. Deal with it. The anime and manga have just as much input as the games.Excuse me, but what is Pokémon? A video game with a story that fits more and less with the game mechanics. Remember that the anime and manga were based from the games.
Please stop saying the anime is not canon. I put this in the pokemon general section for a reason. If I wanted a lecture on game mechanics or the same list of pokemon repeated 30x, I would've posted it in the games section.We can only see the anime (not canon) and play the games with the story restricted by the mechanics.
I like the idea of offspring without breeding. It could explain why legends who are genderless can sometimes reproduce, which would explain the Lugia.People have some problems to accept different things, like that Manaphy breading thing, every single legendary can probably bread(if they were real, of course), and besides, even some animals can generate descendants, without another from the same specie, like some reptiles, and some frogs.