- 10,673
- Posts
- 16
- Years
- Seen yesterday
Yeah, I like you Lewhatever. Hurry up with my review!
And excuse me? You're looking into smods and our activity logs? That's ridiculous. I don't think you even know the point of an smod, otherwise you wouldn't be looking at our activity logs. We aren't required to do any moderating unless the reports pile up or a forum doesn't have a moderator. In which case, we usually do our fair share between the four of us. Our jobs are primarily to post in HQ and handle community-wide issues brought to us by members, and all of us do just a fine job doing that.
If you were in it for as long as you said you've been in it, maybe you would have been an administrator by then.
You clearly don't know a contradiction when you see one.OH SNAP!
...That's because OVP has intelligent members and there isn't much moderating to do. Sammi and I may not see eye to eye on happenings in the forums, but being a former OVP mod, it doesn't need much upkeeping. You need to be a bit more subjective and not hold people to the exact same standards.Your activity isn't the best, sammi-san. I like your attitude, and I like the way you're agreeing with me. We need more of that around here, but your activity could be much much better. I was going to remove you, but now I'm going to have to reconsider.
Your activity isn't the best, sammi-san. I like your attitude, and I like the way you're agreeing with me. We need more of that around here, but your activity could be much much better. I was going to remove you, but now I'm going to have to reconsider.
There's always something to do on a forum. Moderators are in charge of regulating the forums, and there is a constant flow of information that requires some form of regulation....That's because OVP has intelligent members and there isn't much moderating to do. Sammi and I may not see eye to eye on happenings in the forums, but being a former OVP mod, it doesn't need much upkeeping. You need to be a bit more subjective and not hold people to the exact same standards.
That hasn't worked. I've seen plenty of threads in HQ where they decided to talk to someone instead of outright removing them, and in most cases, they tend to not improve.Maybe try the tactic of talking to the person in question before immediate removal?
Not that you know anything about reason so not sure why I'm bothering.
Like I said, I have to reconsider.:(
I'm sorry, sir! please don't demote me.
You can be worthy of a mod position by doing your job.Apparently the only way to be worthy of a mod position is to agree with Lerroux. How sad.
That hasn't worked. I've seen plenty of threads in HQ where they decided to talk to someone instead of outright removing them, and in most cases, they tend to not improve.