• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • It's time to vote for your favorite Pokémon Battle Revolution protagonist in our new weekly protagonist poll! Click here to cast your vote and let us know which PBR protagonist you like most.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

My first card here - Treecko!

Ivar

Acanthite Music Composer
    • 9
    Posts
    20
    Years
    • Seen Jul 13, 2008
    My Cards E-Lair (Maybe this will attract people...)

    This is the first card I post HERE.
    Now, here is Treecko:
    *image removed*



    Do you like it?
     
    Last edited:
    It's very cool ^^ Nice job mate :D
     
    Nice card but i would put it diamond insteadof star.9/10.Imperssive for first try
     
    Last edited:
    Very good card. Font seems right, and placement is good. Missing the 9 digit ID and the font width on the attack effect seems wrong (but it could be right, my eyes may just be messing up). Needs to be 96%. 8.5/10

    Please do not post links to other forums. It is against the rules, you can see the rules by clicking on the button at th top of the page.
     
    And also the bottom right corner set symbol does not need to go outside to the yellow border part of the card.
     
    [PokeCommunity.com] My first card here - Treecko!
    It reminded me of Gumbi at first! First off I love the image. All your words ect are nice and clean cut. Really nice card!
     
    Yes, good fake for the first one. though, many errors XD
    The attacks are too far apart; your attacks don't have to fill the whole effect thing even thogh it will look better if you do, its optional. And according to its effects, it should be at least 1 retreat cost. And also, I always thought it was Treeko XD But anywho, nice job. 6.5/10
    Signed, Akira
     
    MiNuN* said:
    Yes, good fake for the first one. though, many errors XD
    The attacks are too far apart; your attacks don't have to fill the whole effect thing even thogh it will look better if you do, its optional. And according to its effects, it should be at least 1 retreat cost. And also, I always thought it was Treeko XD But anywho, nice job. 6.5/10
    Signed, Akira
    Click to expand...
    Well, exactly as you say, it's OPTIONAL, so it isn't wrong. Second, the effect and the attack are powerful, but no Retreat cost should be hightend for that! It may be a bit powerful for a basic, but it's a rare holo, so that's possible AND allowed. Again, NOT WRONG.

    So, overall, I'm getting a bit pissed by your rating. A 6,5/10 for no wrongs??!! Eventhough those two thing you mentioned WERE wrong, a 6,5/10 wouldn't be honest either!So please think again of your rating according to my arguments!

    Ivar
     
    But when u rate only the outside it will be bether.. :) 8/10
     
    Oh excuse me if you don't like my rating Ivar, I was just pointing out my perspective not a rating that has to be similar to everyone elses. I will point out your errors THOROUGHLY if you want me to then :\
    > The weakness fire energy is too close to "Weakness"
    > The retreat cost is a mistake by the way.
    > "Treecko" is too far away from the card border.
    > "Treecko" is too far away from the pic border.
    > The Pok?-power, Evergreen, is too close to the pic border.
    > Font and HP seems alright for a card.
    > And the only way the right way to get 10/10 is when you have someone like Kai rate it, too bad he doesn't go on PC anymore.
    > Adjust rating to 7/10.
     
    That's cool! I give it 8/10!
    Two observations:
    >That Treecko must have Repeat Cost because is quite strong(for a basic Pokemon)
    >You must do something with the R is the botom of the card
     
    sorry

    Ok, sorry for the mad 'n bad words.
    I see all errors now, too......(since it's an old card for me: I made 18 after that one already)


    Here's a new card from my set EX:Light

    Ho-oh

    *image removed*


    What do you think?
     
    That is good, except that (I think) text doesn't go all the way below the damage. Might want to edit that. Btw, how do you make the shiny background? I've been wondewrin'.
     
    Oh Hey Ivar! The Sukhoi person!
    (IM Aki-chan by the way)
    Sorry for my snappiness in my post, last week or so I've been stacked with a lot of exams so I was a bit stressed. Refer to the Other Cards forum to see what I've been truly like other than this. O___O

    Well for your Ho-Oh, first I'll say the Pokepower is quite overpowred. And it doesnt say where to attach the fire energy to Ho-Oh. (Deck/Discard Pile/Hand etc) And you can keep doing it. Heh, if you have a plain fire deck Ho-Oh would probably have an unlimited supply of fire energys..
    Other than that, Its a good card.
    87/100. ^_^
     
    It's supposed to be the [F] Energies from your hand.

    In that way, it isn't overpowered (the Power) because the chance is tiny that you'll have 20 [F] Energies in your hand.

    I'm sure the Wording is correct, though. It's (almost) the same as on the Base Set's Blastoise.
     
    Hmm, Base Set is different from now, Ivar but anyway..

    SUP IVAR MY MAN!! XD I know, I gave a sh!t rating, sorry. :P

    Your illustration font is too blurry XD Better quality graphic needed by the way.

    Anyway, see you around.
     
    A Sh!t rating? No, no, no.........

    It would be a 8,7 here in the Netherlands and if you have that for a test, you can be really proud!

    You're right, the illus. font is blurry; but the whole thing is blurry...
    I think I'll never trust JPG format again for any Ho-oh I'll ever make!

    I made an Articuno for a contest, so here I'll show you.
    Be aware: it's JPG too!
    For the blank: Big thanks to CMP and Fang!

    *image removed*

    Do you like it?
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top