North Korea Warns it will End the Truce

[ANARCHit3cht]

Another reasons that China shall not attack:

The international community, including the North's main ally China, strongly condemned its latest nuclear test.

Nobody is liking their testing :S.

 

[Midnight Beat]

Anyway i beleive that if the U.S can search and seize cargo off of N.Korean ships then N.Korea can do the same. You say that N.Korea has no right? Well then neither does the U.S.

It's more of a responsiblity than a right. Being a superpower, the US has an obligation to try to keep peace in the world. And if that means searching cargo to make sure it is just cargo, than by all means do it. The UN told N. Korea that they have not proven themselves stable enough to hold possession of nukes, and yet they still sneak them in. That is why they need to be watched so closely.

The whole debate over nuclear weapons in N.Korea is spurred by fear... The fear that another country will become more powerful the then United States.

...the day N. Korea becomes more powerful than the US is the day that a pig flys in a forzen hell under blue moonlight. They may be dangerous, but they don't have the political strength to become that powerful. All they have are weapons which can be swatted out of the sky.

The U.S are preaching that no nation should be allowed to have nuclear weapons, while they have the largest amount of nuclear weapons.

Two very differnet situations, you can't even compare the two.

If N.korea attacks us then we can bomb the hell out of them in retalliation and then N.korea wil be but a smoldering ruin. Until then we should not be halting N.Korea's advance into a stronger nation. If they attack, we attack. Simple as that.

So you're saying instead of solvoing this problem now with little to no bloodsheld, we should just wait until innocent people are killed in an act of war? An act of war which will lead to a decalred war and therefore kill more innocent people on both sides.
[/QUOTE]

 

[Trap-Eds]

Okay, the United Nations (I don't know how many times I have to say this) has issued a command that ANY North Korean ships suspected of carrying weapons, or other illegal items is to be searched. It's the fact that North Korea is suspected of selling illegal weapons to other countries. (Such as Iran)

Us "snooping" is to protect the entire world from being terrorized by illegal weapons being transported to where ever they are taking them to. Is it really that hard for you to understand?

I understand how severe and deadly nuclear weapons are. I understand that the UN is just trying to prevent war. I just don't want the higher powers to be jumping to conclusions, especially since N.Korea is already mad.

 

[Cornelius]

I always figured America was doomed anyway. :\

You're so pessimistic.

I've actually been seeing articles like this for the past month, so I've come to one conclusion: North Korea needs to stop starting stuff.
Seriously, why are they doing any of this? I've read that they've been warning us, but I've never seen any legitimate reason for doing so.

 

[Midnight Beat]

Seriously, why are they doing any of this? I've read that they've been warning us, but I've never seen any legitimate reason for doing so.

The same reason any country stocks up on weapons. They want influence and have no other way of going after it.

 

[Mr. X]

Time to clear a couple things up.

Originally Posted by Mr. X
Anyway i beleive that if the U.S can search and seize cargo off of N.Korean ships then N.Korea can do the same. You say that N.Korea has no right? Well then neither does the U.S.

It's more of a responsiblity than a right. Being a superpower, the US has an obligation to try to keep peace in the world. And if that means searching cargo to make sure it is just cargo, than by all means do it. The UN told N. Korea that they have not proven themselves stable enough to hold possession of nukes, and yet they still sneak them in. That is why they need to be watched so closely.

I am going to say this. The U.N has no right to interfere with the busnuiess of a independent nation. If they attempt to then N.Korea has the right to defend itself from outside interference. Once all the nations unite under one flag then the U.N will have the right to, but until then they don't.

Originally Posted by Mr. X
The whole debate over nuclear weapons in N.Korea is spurred by fear... The fear that another country will become more powerful the then United States.

...the day N. Korea becomes more powerful than the US is the day that a pig flys in a forzen hell under blue moonlight. They may be dangerous, but they don't have the political strength to become that powerful. All they have are weapons which can be swatted out of the sky.

If the weapons can be 'swatted out of the sky' then what is the issue here? You have implyed that the weapons that they have are not a threat.

Originally Posted by Mr. X
The U.S are preaching that no nation should be allowed to have nuclear weapons, while they have the largest amount of nuclear weapons.

Two very differnet situations, you can't even compare the two.

Practice what you preach, practice what you preach.

Originally Posted by Mr. X
If N.korea attacks us then we can bomb the hell out of them in retalliation and then N.korea wil be but a smoldering ruin. Until then we should not be halting N.Korea's advance into a stronger nation. If they attack, we attack. Simple as that.

So you're saying instead of solvoing this problem now with little to no bloodsheld, we should just wait until innocent people are killed in an act of war? An act of war which will lead to a decalred war and therefore kill more innocent people on both sides.

I said if, not when. If implys that it might happen. And remember. Each answer only brings more questions.

My replys in bold

Also i might be wrong who has the most nuclear weapons but it stands that the u.s has one of the largest collections.