Ring of doom is a real card. And a older one. why do you know everything about the newer cards but nothing about the older cards?
Because I started playing after the age of Chaos? =0 *Le Sigh* Judging by the looks of things, the one who's knowledge is in need of patching up here is you; the card you described is indeed Ring of Destruction, a card which I am very well aware of. Don't blame it on me if your grasp of the game is so poor that you can't even get the card names right. <.<
Plus you must not know penguin solders effect. when flipped it can destroy 2 monsters on the field, allowing for a direct attack if played in the firt few moves.
Penguin Soldier doesn't destroy squat; like Thesis said, it returns two monsters
to the hand. You would do well to appreciate the difference in a format where Special Summons are rampant. -.-
Yes, I know the value of the Penguin for dedicated stall and burn approaches, but unless you have something in store to nail those monsters after you've tossed them back (or keep them from returning) then all you've done is delay the inevitable. Yet again, the lack of knowledge seems to be on
your side; quite peculiar, eh? =O
Anyway why do you seem to think every monster card is worthless? They aren't. I don't see how buster blader, or elemental here bladedge is useless. And trap hole is about as worthless as exodia...
Anything that's two tributes and gets outclassed in usefulness by one-tribute is junk unless it serves some kind of powerful synergy. (Malicious Edge pwns Bladedge in utility and just about
any of the big beaters totally sock it to Buster Blader). You're also running a lot of normal monsters with horribly subpar stats, not to mention that vanilla monsters without vanilla support are subpar to begin with, not to mention that your effect monsters are all over the board and have virtually no positive interaction with each other or
any cards in your deck for that matter, hence why your monster lineup fails miserably. Also, Trap Hole is largely useless because the current format is abusing the graveyard so bad it's not even funny. Say you flipped trap hole against a Dark Armed player's Armageddon Knight. Yes, technically you've taken their monster, but in practice you just brought them one step closer to summoning their namesake beatstick by adding another dark to their graveyard. Also, relying on a trap that can only interfere with Normal Summon when all the serious trouble to you tends to come from special summons is hardly an efficient strategy. Bottomless Trap Hole is a superior substitute to regular Trap Hole in virtually any scenario, and thus regular Trap Hole is a subpar card. I.e. Junk.
If i could i would bet that i could either beat you or at least give you a run for your money with this deck. Its not the cards that are important. I could have a deck with the weakest cards in the game and i could, with lot of stratigy and a bit of luck, take out a much superior deck.
Given that you have zero pieces of permanent S/T removal whereas my current test deck is packing D.D. Borderline, Gravity Bind and goodness knows how many other stall cards, not to mention a far stronger retinue of punishing burn cards
and a more consistent monster and S/T destruction engine I somehow find myself doubtful about this.
Your verdict, Icha? You're the only one here who's played against me. ;D
But by all means...if you ever get Spirit Caller I will be glad to take you on. :3
I really suguest that you take some time to read up on the older cards and their effects, and really think how they can be used instead of what card you should use with it. Who cares if this one card can double the effect of another card. If used right you wouldn't need to double the effect.
Why commit a needless amount of moves and jump through a crazy amount of hoops with multiple cards when you can accomplish the same results far easier
and more consistently with one? The hallmark of a master is making the complex seem simple; not the other way around. -.- Besides, this is a
deck rate. Not a player rate, not a hear-of-the-cards rate, not a how-much-do-I-love-obscure-junk rate, a
deck rate. Therefore, if I see cards that have superior substitutes I will suggest replacing them because it will make the deck better. Whether or not the player could have pulled through with a sub-optimal build is not the issue.
As for knowing your cards...I think I shall refrain from commenting further since the irony in your post that has already been pointed out is practically tangible.
Anyways...Thes, we both have the same dream burn deck! =D *High five* Where's the Magic Cylinder, though? It's another layer of protection for Reficule and has a bit more utility than Dimension Wall for this build. :3
